this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1409 points (96.4% liked)

solarpunk memes

2807 readers
186 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 15 points 11 months ago (18 children)

Okay? And how are we supposed to deal with the emissions currently in the atmosphere? Even if we abandon all technologies that generate greenhouse gases overnight, we still have shit in the atmosphere warming the planet.

The most compelling strategy I've heard is biochar. You immolate organic matter in a medium like nitrogen so you don't get carbon dioxide, and then you bury the char or use it as fertilizer. The char is relatively stable so shouldn't create much in the way of carbon dioxide once it's formed, and because you make it in an oxygen-less atmosphere you don't get more greenhouse gases from making it.

[–] bentropy@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Absolutely, I also think Biochar is very promising as one way to recapture atmospheric CO2 and to compensate further emissions.

While I understood the production process to be a little different, the benefits of Biochar can't be ignored.

  • low in energy consumption
  • low in recourse cost
  • very good scalable
  • no hidden science or process
  • the stored carbon can be used as a soil amendment
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The process may be a bit more complex than I understood, but my understanding is that the gist of it is to "burn" plant stuff in a way that doesn't create carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases. One way of doing that is to use a chamber flooded with nitrogen or similar inert gas. No oxygen means carbon can't bind to two oxygen atoms to create carbon dioxide.

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm confused, how can you 'burn' anything without oxygen? Burn literally means to oxidize

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago

That's why it's in quotes. You're subjecting it to high heat, which would normally cause it to burn, but because there's no oxygen it chars instead.

load more comments (14 replies)