this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
352 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2995 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was watching the talking head shows last night at someone raised a good point:

McCarthy was only good at fundraising, that was his strength.

After 1/6, corporate donations for the insurrection candidates dropped off a cliff, and without that fundraising, McCarthy literally has nothing.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can see that. Given the actions of the current Speaker, I don't see the party changing back any time soon.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Nope, it's going to take a full implosion before anything changes, and if Trump loses in '24, he'll keep coming back until he wins or dies.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's a question of "keep coming back". Whether he wins or loses, he won't leave. I want to be clear I am prognosticating, not advocating, but I feel strongly that the next election will lead to some kind of violence - regardless of outcome.

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm convinced we're at the end of this age - think Wheel of Time. The current civilization has run it's course and is about to collapse like it has done countless times before. Trump wins and America turns into the next autocracy. Or Trump loses and the conservatives keep working towards their goals next term, with or without Trump.

And either way, World War 3 is just around the corner. Tensions are high all over the world and Russia won't stop provocating wars. This is the same kind of build up we saw in WW1 all over again, except this time we have nuclear weapons at play.

All we can do is try to survive, and hope that when we are reborn this will have all blown over.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Or trump fails and continues to try, continuing the erosion of the Republican parties ability to win elections. Sure, some places move right but the majority of America moves left and the Dems start to move left too because of it.

Sure, there may be violence but that's not the same as a civil war and likely will be quickly quelled. 1/6 was amateur hour but it was scary how easily it still was allowed to happen.iy won't be allowed in the same way again, but it's important to prosecute those responsible for round 1, in order to not get multiple rounds after.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My hunch is that if the Republican Party implodes, anything but a symbolic leftward shift by the Democrat party will be halted by a flow of money from donors.

Any real change won’t happen without overturning citizens united.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

I'd be fine if the Democrats became the conservative party without changing a single policy goal. A new party can emerge to their left.

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Either Trump wins, which will destabilize America and lead to the collapse of society

Or

Trump loses and the Republicans continue pushing more and more extreme candidates. I know everyone here loves to circle jerk themselves about how all the Republicans will just die out and I think that's really near-sighted. Lots of young people increasingly support Trump. I'm around Gen z a lot and not all of them are democrats.

Or

Russia, feeling the pressure of an endless war, colludes with China, India, and the Arabs to wage all out war against America. Alone, none of them stand a chance against the US Military. But together, maybe they figure they have a chance. There's a lot of deep seeded anti-american resentment out in the world. A lot of politicians are tired of the American hegemony, and they have lots of support.

I just don't see a scenario where Trump loses, the Republicans give up trying to institute a theocracy, and Putin says "ok I guess this is enough war, we'll go home".

And I haven't even mentioned what would happen to global markets if Russia collapsed and countries started coalescing out of the rubble.

Or of the Israeli-Hamas genocide.

Or of unstoppable climate change.

Or of the pandemics that are sweeping the world.

Global hunger is on the rise again.

Make no mistake, this is the end of a chapter in human history. I'm not religious; I don't believe this is the end of days or anything like that. I think humans will survive and will continue to build new and great things. But I think a shitload of people are going to die first.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

The biggest thing that kills countries or societies is revolts. China is experimenting to see if they can hold back revolts using technology to control citizens. We will have to wait and see if it works or instead creates a bigger tipping point.

For those in power before, war allowed them to increase their riches. As economies have become more interdependent, war hinders wealth generation, apart from on the military industrial complex. The incentive for war is less. That's the whole point of the EU, the marshall plan and globalisation efforts in general. It seems to be working. Putins position is more precarious than before the war. Trump is less liked overall, but does have more youth support than previously. That may be a side effect of youth growing up knowing no difference. 20 year old voters now were kids before he was a politician.

Look at current hardship with cost of living increases after the pandemic. Things are hard and it's starting to stabilize but it's less widespread hardship than, say, the great recession after Spanish flu. There is a rose in populism and authoritarianism worldwide but there has not yet been the same backwards jump in living standards.

If Trump is successful, I think he'll struggle to do much. He's old and it's dangerous but he's self interested, so as soon as it's hard he gives up and leaves it to others. If he loses, his power within politics diminishes more. The Republicans can try to shake him off and risk him weakening them or continue as now and go down with him. They will weaken either way, as has already been happening. I'm optimistic that we are indeed at one of those turning points in humanity. I wonder if the rise of ai and self driving will free many from work and truly lead to a post scarcity society. It all depends on how we distribute the spoils.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe you shouldn't base you worldview on decades old fantasy novels.

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Civilization has never once collapsed and it certainly isn't a regular thing.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Who are you quoting?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It’ll be the latter