this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
280 points (97.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29678 readers
1349 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Much easier to reject bad CVs. On the other hand every job post is the same and you have to check Glassdoor and Crunchbase before applying to a potential bad company

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 53 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Literally yes. I have reviewed over 10,000 resumes between my last two positions. Our current posting has 3,600 applicants.

Should we close the posting? Probably, but we don't. Whenever I have time I sift through the resumes. Most don't get looked at for even 10 seconds. Cover letters don't get read. Stop including cringe things like "Microsoft Word" before PHP and Python in your skills, it makes me think you have nothing better to offer besides what I've read so far, and I'll skip reading the rest of your resume because of it.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 74 points 11 months ago

We can't, the filter before you makes sure word is listed in proficiencies, and if not, rejects the applicant even if they wrote Word themselves.

Yo you're probably alright but i seriously hate you rn.

[–] yum@lemmy.eco.br 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

What if the person is REALLY GOOD with Microsoft Word, though?

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then they applied for the wrong job. I haven't used a word processor at all in many years. Power point is (saddly) important, but no word processor. When I write docs markdown or restructured text is what i'm looking for, since both can link directly to the code.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] yum@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So basically, you read their job titles and a couple bullet points? Maybe the skill section?

I'm job hunting, and I've just switched to a strategy where I focus on those things being amazing and tailored to the job.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Skill section, then I skim bulletpoints if I haven't binned it yet. Anything that passes the bulletpoint section goes to a check-later pile, which I revisit and choose who to interview

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Cool, that sounds about right. I'm guessing you're hiring mostly for individual contributors if you're looking at skills first?

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

IT here, I skim the titles, company, dates, and look at a couple bullet point. If things look good I’ll read the full doc. I don’t hundreds or thousands of apps though since I’m not offering a remote or hybrid position

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is why it is soooo important to network. I'm far more likely to read a resume given to me by a friend or someone I know verses a random resume that lands in my inbox.

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

"Networking" increasingly just means nepotism.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Nepotism is when you hire someone unqualified because you know them.

Networking is when you hire someone who is qualified because you know them.

[–] fiveoar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

It always did.

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago

Who would you rather hire, a qualified person you've met at least once outside of the hiring process and like, or a qualified person who is a complete unknown outside of their likely embellished resume?

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

This thread is just so sensitive it seems. I have been on the shit end of the stick this year with losing two jobs and I still agree with so many of the recruiters in this thread and your comment. I don’t want to network, but sadly that does increase the likelihood of getting my resume looked at. These people need to understand that people who are looking at resumes are also working, if your qualifications are in the details instead of being upfront then I’m sorry, no one will spend longer time to look at your resume compared to thousands of other resumes.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

I know you're getting slammed but honestly people say they can "use Microsoft Word" but I bet 70% of people in an interview/test setting (ie no googling) could not create a dynamic paragraph that changes its content based on a dropdown and then print the paragraph but not the drop-down.

[–] roo@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Use a form attached to a spreadsheet FTLoG! What a finicky way to dunce your job!

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also stop using those terrible templates that look someone crashed into Adobe InDesign one day.

The hate you got from your comment is really coming from edgy people with no real professional or leadership experience who just hope and pray that everything is like an episode of the Smurfs or something.