this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
235 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59525 readers
3457 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
235
A City on Mars: Reality kills space settlement dreams (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by meyotch to c/technology@lemmy.world
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A book review on the latest Weinersmith creation. It’s true, there is so much we don’t know.

Just throwing this out there on this forum because missing technology is the problem that kills the dream of Mars, according to the authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you build spinning space stations instead of settlements on the martian or lunar surface. Likely close to the same material cost, if not cheaper, while allowing us to actually choose the amount of gravity to generate. We don't know if martian or lunar gravity would even be sufficient to avoid negative health affects.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Do those count for gravity ? Are there other downsides that we haven't even thought of? Many unknowns.