this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
235 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
4318 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A book review on the latest Weinersmith creation. It’s true, there is so much we don’t know.

Just throwing this out there on this forum because missing technology is the problem that kills the dream of Mars, according to the authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had some Elon-stan dude being adamant that it would be safer to colonize Mars because what if the apocalypse happened on Earth? I asked him what an event like that would look like and he said a giant asteroid. I linked him to a wiki page outlining major crater impacts on Mars to get him started and he never responded. I'd like to think that he learned a valuable lesson in astronomy but I can never be too sure.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's silly. The asteroid point isn't that Mars is somehow asteroid-proof, it's that having a presence on multiple planets prevents any one single planet-destabilizing disaster from causing our species' extinction.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right, but his thought process was that Mars was somehow immune to asteroid impacts and that made it safer. Like, he hadn't considered that a single unfortunate event was possible. It's ironically safer here on Earth but thought this planet had nothing going for it.

The point isn't whether or not it could happen, the point is that it hadn't crossed his mind and was jumping in with two feet at the idea.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, I try not to jump to conclusions based on my speculation on others' thought processes.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And that's fine, but don't assume that's what people do. You do you. I wouldn't say otherwise if he hadn't been explicit about it.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point isn't that Mars is somehow less vulnerable to asteroid impacts than Earth, it's that asteroids aren't likely to hit Earth and Mars at the same time.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He thought they didn't happen on Mars for some reason and that he wanted to colonize it to hopefully abandon Earth altogether because we have apparently no hope here whatsoever and the planet isn't salvageable anyway.