this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17683 readers
18 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't quite understand a lot of the details on how the implementations work.

In what ways is AT better or worse than ActivityPub? Are there different versions of ActivityPub? Are there improvements coming to either to make them better (or compatible)?

My current understanding is

  • AT makes it easier to move accounts (according to them), but AT is controlled and maintained by BlueSky, and they are a for-profit company that can mess with the protocol in the future, which goes against the central idea of decentralized social media

What other cool technical details are there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bogdugg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

while yes it’s cool that I can talk to Lemmy from my Mastodon account, it’s quite a clunky experience

I do wish they were slightly more interoperable. It's currently very hard if not impossible to discuss Mastodon posts directly within Lemmy, and likewise you can't make a Mastodon-style post to your personal Lemmy profile. These may seem like unimportant changes, but I think much of that stems from still viewing these services from the frame of the limitations of what they are based on. They could be so much more!

Lemmy itself has big problems with the interoperability of servers. There are two major issues I see with the way communities are structured. The first is that listed subscriber numbers are for your server only, which makes the entire ecosystem seem way less lively than it actually is, which has the effect of making it even less so. Subscriber numbers should be fed in from a community's home server.

The second is that there are many redundant communities, which makes it difficult for onboarding new users. There should be some way to group like-communities into super-groups based on topics. That way community leaders have the ability to easily aggregate similar content, rather than leaving it to the user to figure out, and you could opt-out as a user by simply not subscribing to the super-group community.

[–] poVoq 5 points 11 months ago

Mastodon has promised to add groups soonish, so that will likely improve interoperability with Lemmy a lot.

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The first is that listed subscriber numbers are for your server only

For your first issue, subscriber counts will be fixed in Lemmy v0.19.0

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/1440

Preview here: https://voyager.lemmy.ml/communities?listingType=All&sort=TopMonth&page=1

The second is that there are many redundant communities, which makes it difficult for onboarding new users. There should be some way to group like-communities into super-groups based on topics

Yeah this one has an issue open, you could join the discussion if you have any ideas, this is a big one

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 11 months ago

FWIW, Kbin does have some microblogging capabilities - used it a little before joining this instance. I know magazines can have a dedicated microblogging community. I feel like it's a decent equivalent to Reddit live chats.