this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
614 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
4357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 104 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Crazy how decentralization improves both, but they are vehemently against that. I trust them in terms of privacy, but their insistence on centralization, blocking third party apps, removing SMS, and refusal to support fdroid, I'm not a fan of the direction they've gone recently.

[–] z0rg0n@monero.town 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fr. Fuck signal for removing SMS support

[–] KapiteinPoffertje@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I assume that is exactly for one of the reasons they mentioned in the article: increasing costs for sms

[–] witten@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wait. Signal was an SMS client. It wouldn't cost them anything for a user to send an SMS message. IIRC, they nixed the SMS feature for security reasons, not cost.

[–] z0rg0n@monero.town -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's what they told me when gave then feedback through their website.

There's no free lunch and corporations aren't the most trustworthy source of information though so maybe it was about cost.

[–] ninchuka@lemmy.one 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

isnt signal a nonprofit? not a corporation

[–] z0rg0n@monero.town 2 points 11 months ago

Some nonprofit organizations are corporations and have pretty shitty practices:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_Wish_Network

The Morman church is another US 'non-profit organization' yet somehow hordes billions.

Trusting blindly without doing research because something is presented as a non-profit is a good way to be taken for a fool and separated from your money.

When signal made their own cryptocurrency which they entirely premined was a huge red flag. Dropping SMS support was an annoyance that broke the camels back.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I think you are right. I too was really mad at Signal for ditching sms, and THEN having the audacity to ask for donations! This article shines a light on the reasons, wow.

Still, I would only donate if they kept sms in there. Not without sms because now it's just one more isolated platform and no longer a one-stop solution at it used to be.

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

The sms cost is for account creation and verification on new devices, being an sms client didn't cost anything aside from maintaining that portion of the app

[–] gulasch_hanuta@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

A bit of transparency at the beginning would've helped...

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

One reason was worry that people accidentally send SMS when they mean to send a secure message

[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Removing SMS support makes sense. The potential for a user sending something through SMS that they thought was going over Signal is high. Even for the savvier users who would install Signal in the first place.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (5 children)

It killed adoption, since now it's just another messaging app. Most of my contacts still use SMS, and will stay on it, so being able to use Signal was a smooth all-in-one experience. Now I have no point in keeping it installed because like 3 of my contacts use it, so it has no use to me, thus killing potential adoption.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They've never had more users.

And if you had spent 3 minutes looking at r/Signal or the support forum before they disabled SMS you would have seen how many people were confused by the feature.

[–] Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Sms was kinda shite on it. I ended up using my Samsung messaging app for actual sms.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Exactly the opposite. Removing sms was the thing that finally made me recommend it to my friends and family. People understand sms replacements. People understand alternate messaging apps. People don't understand encrypted sms.

If you have people who love whatsapp, it's super easy to get them to use signal instead.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

It killed adoption

Well for Yanks

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Perfect, that keeps you off signal and lowers their operating costs.

Because if you actually needed signal, you’d still be using it. Security and privacy is not about convenience or a “smooth all-in-one experience”. It’s about actual security and privacy. And that is what signal provides.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

That makes no sense. Anyways I've moved to Matrix mostly anyways.

[–] Lime66@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
  • Signal wants to be as secure as possible
  • F droid has security issues
  • It makes perfect sense to me
[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, of course the company is against what will lose the company money.

They're not doing this because they care about privacy, lol.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Paying 19 million dollars in wages for 50 people....

There's profit there, for sure.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Profit can be distorted based on how much your paying employees.

[–] qwerty_bastard@feddit.uk -2 points 11 months ago
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

It doesn't affect their money though

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I haven't been able to trust them since the get go, to be honest. Their whole stance against federation is.. FUDdy to stay polite: https://gultsch.de/objection.html