this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
133 points (92.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9642 readers
346 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Roundabouts would like a word. Properly designed ones don't need to dramatically lower speeds and are more efficient. And can easily be made pedestrian friendly. It doesn't have to be either or.

[–] LibertyLizard 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can they though? What does a pedestrian friendly roundabout look like? The ones I’ve seen seem outright hostile.

I tried to find data but it doesn’t seem well studied. Since standard road design is so horrifically unsafe, unless it is substantially better it does not seem worth redesigning the intersection. I’d rather see that money go into something that has a proven benefit.

Further reading: https://streets.mn/2017/11/17/are-roundabouts-safer-for-pedestrians/

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crosswalk bridges. Something used in not just roundabouts.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crosswalk bridges are pretty hostile to pedestrians. They need to be at least 4 meters/12 ft high, to accommodate standard lorries. Nobody likes climbing high stairs on every crossing. Even worse for wheelchair users.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only we'd invented some sort of sloped surface. Maybe call it a "ramp"?

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scaling a 4 meter high ramps on every intersection sounds like a fucking nightmare

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, because no one anywhere has ever built a ramp that made sense.

You're intentionally being obtuse.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter how much sense your ramp makes, it still needs enough height to allow trucks to pass under it. That's a lot of height to gain. Any sensible ramp would be very long and take up a lot of space, and be very impractical to have to scale at every intersection.