this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1076 points (90.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

29723 readers
1320 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And interestingly it’s trustable because it’s got no central authority core that can be corrupted

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Except there are defacto central authorities governing certain pages.

Not only that there's a turf war going on for control of them.

Certain ahem religious organizations monitor a variety of pages and snipe any changes they disagree with. Businesses are doing it too.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago

And certain politicians

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] not_a_bot_i_swear@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Probably all of them... Just a guess though.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I haven’t participated in wikipedia enough to see how these turf wars play out. I’ve heard that, unsurprisingly, there are groups that control pages, some opposed and some unopposed. It’s a really interesting thing to me.

I’m afraid of politics, generally speaking. But I bet it would be interesting to be a part of all that.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the word you're looking for is "trustworthy" but yes.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I consider it a separate concept.

[–] Metz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, apart from the admins that have absolute authority over everything and can do whatever the hell they want and make up arbitrary rules that disqualify your perfectly valid sources.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There definitely are editors who game the rules. And they are enough of a problem that sometimes rules need to be modified specifically to handle them.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you seem to be conflating editors with admins.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Admins are a subgroup of editors. As more senior members, they should behave more responsibly. But some don't.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

That's is definitely not true...