Abolition of police and prisons
Abolish is to flourish! Against the prison industrial complex and for transformative justice.
See Critical Resistance's definitions below:
The Prison Industrial Complex
The prison industrial complex (PIC) is a term we use to describe the overlapping interests of government and industry that use surveillance, policing, and imprisonment as solutions to economic, social and political problems.
Through its reach and impact, the PIC helps and maintains the authority of people who get their power through racial, economic and other privileges. There are many ways this power is collected and maintained through the PIC, including creating mass media images that keep alive stereotypes of people of color, poor people, queer people, immigrants, youth, and other oppressed communities as criminal, delinquent, or deviant. This power is also maintained by earning huge profits for private companies that deal with prisons and police forces; helping earn political gains for "tough on crime" politicians; increasing the influence of prison guard and police unions; and eliminating social and political dissent by oppressed communities that make demands for self-determination and reorganization of power in the US.
Abolition
PIC abolition is a political vision with the goal of eliminating imprisonment, policing, and surveillance and creating lasting alternatives to punishment and imprisonment.
From where we are now, sometimes we can't really imagine what abolition is going to look like. Abolition isn't just about getting rid of buildings full of cages. It's also about undoing the society we live in because the PIC both feeds on and maintains oppression and inequalities through punishment, violence, and controls millions of people. Because the PIC is not an isolated system, abolition is a broad strategy. An abolitionist vision means that we must build models today that can represent how we want to live in the future. It means developing practical strategies for taking small steps that move us toward making our dreams real and that lead us all to believe that things really could be different. It means living this vision in our daily lives.
Abolition is both a practical organizing tool and a long-term goal.
view the rest of the comments
They make concessions because the alternative is to have even less, which is what they're getting as a result of the murder and kidnapping rampage by Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
Okay let's try again with simpler words:
The Palestinians have nothing. How do you give up nothing?
Israel is fabricating consent for their genocide.
They have land. They have people. Both can be lost if they're unable to figure out how to prevent Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and their successors from going on kidnapping and murder rampages.
Maybe if Israel stopped stealing their land and houses, bombing them, cutting off their supplies of water, food and medicine and generally wasn't actively perpetuating a genocide, and also offered them something real, then they would be more amenable to peace talks.
It's hard to imagine how the Palestinian people would give Israel any benefit of any doubt at this stage. Their genocidal project has been clear for decades.
And no, they won't lose everything. That basically can't be done. It's fascist propaganda to imply there's some complete final solution that can be enacted on a minority group. They'll just keep oppressing and harming them and create a diaspora. It's an endless project, not one that can be completed.
Would be great. How about Hamas and Islamic Jihad release the people they kidnapped and turn themselves over? It would pretty quickly get rid of Netanyahu's political support for the use of force.
You misunderstand Netanyahu’s calculus here. He wants genocide. It HAS ALWAYS BEEN genocide from the Nakba. Bombing Gaza is a poor way of rescuing hostages, unless you plan to kill the hostages.
It's meant to impose a sufficiently large cost on Hamas and Islamic Jihad that they don't repeat it again. Only way out is for those two groups to surrender, which is what they'd do if they actually cared about Palestinians
So genocide is a sufficiently large cost? THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN JUSTIFY INDISCRIMINATE BOMBINGS AGAINST CIVILIANS. If Hamas does it, it’s bad, but when Israel does it, suddenly it’s a justified response?
You mean the "political support for the use of force" that Israel has enjoyed since 1949?
Which Israel will be taking anyway.
Which Israel will be murdering anyway.
Fuuuck... even just the insane hasbara narratives on here makes it perfectly clear that there can be no peaceful co-existence with Israel ever.
So... again - the people suffering white supremacist settler-colonialist genocide are the ones that must "concede" everything?