this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
264 points (93.7% liked)

News

23332 readers
4781 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A homeowner is mulling the next step after a company mistakenly demolished a home she owned in southwest Atlanta.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wow! How fucked is it that a company can fuck up tear your house down at the wrong address then just shurg and apparently you have no recourse? Something off here maybe we aren't getting the whole story. No way that isn't a lawsuit the fact that she in limbo and no attorney wouldn't take the case makes me wonder.

Reading deeper into the story it at first reads like they tore her house down while she was away on vacation. The real story is she wasn't living in said house and it had been vacant for 15 years. So something not adding up.

[–] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Article doesn't say no attorney would take the case. It says they talked to a lawyer. And they're in limbo. Meaning they're still deciding how to pursue this matter.

“We’re still in this process of figuring out what to do,” she said. “We keep pressing in different directions to see if something is going to happen.”

So they're looking for the best approach. Not that there is a lack of approach.

An attorney would happily take a losing case. They get paid either way. Their job is to get the best outcome possible, not to win a lawsuit--though that may end up being the best outcome.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Contingency cases don’t require payment if lost.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Contingency can take 40%, so if they end up suing and settling for just a bit more than the house is worth, it might actually cost them money instead of just getting a directly negotiated settlement from the companies insurance.

That is probally the main issue. A mostly falling apart home isn't worth much in comparison to the land it's on. 100k at most, more likely 25-50k. Bog standard houses themselves aren't that valuable, so suing suddenly is maybe not worth it, which the demo company knows and is abusing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. I’m thinking that may be the issue as well.

[–] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

You're right, that has slipped my mind when posting. However, they can still choose to pay if they want a lawyer if no one is accepting contingency.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is why companies need to have insurance.

So something not adding up.

You think someone wanted the land?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the house was abandon and she even claims it was boarded up. Good chance the county or city allowed this to happen. I have property in a county and the city council in a local town says that if your home looks abandon or trash they will seize your property clean it up then bill you for said clean up. He was very proud of this.

Also how she says she spoke to attorneys and none will take her case and she in limbo means that she has no case and no recourse. I like to know why?

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

I don’t see where it said no lawyer will take her case. Just that there hasn’t been legal action yet.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It goes way beyond insurance and monetary compensation. There needs to be criminal liability for destroying someone's home.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

If the building was in fact "boarded up", then it might be hard to argue that it was someone's home. At least in bankruptcy law inhabited places do have special protections against seizure.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The cops wouldn't like that. They like to be able to destroy people's homes with no repercussion.

[–] ElleChaise@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get that you're being facetious, but even then they'd obviously have immunity if any laws changed. Cops always coppin'.

[–] hiddengoat@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not being facetious. It's a thing. Cops destroy homes with impunity.

[–] Whirlgirl9@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

i know the guy whose house was destroyed by cops in greenwood village in denver. they took it to court and effing lost. the cops additionally did $80k damage to the neighbor's home. it's one of the most rage inducing stories ever.

[–] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Some people have paid off their mortgage, or otherwise don't have the requirement to carry homeowners insurance. If they need an influx of cash to finance something like a lawsuit, they told take a line of credit against their assets. If their biggest asset was destroyed, what the fuck they gonna do