Green - An environmentalist community

5303 readers

3 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml

143

Zoos aren’t for animals. They’re for us. | Zoos say they’re leaders in protecting wildlife. But is it true? (www.vox.com)

submitted 1 year ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But do you act this way when someone says "yeah bleach is known as an effective cleaner" just because you cannot spray bleach on literally every mess in literally every scenario with every surface? I dont think you do.

Well I for sure woudnt say: "Bleach is the most efficient cleaner, it's hard to find a better proven chemical fakt. "

;)

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago

Well its a good thing I, nor the original comment, said anything was the most efficient anything.

Now, if you meant that you wouldnt say "bleach is a known effective cleaner, and its hard to find a better proven chemical fact," you would certainly look the fool, given thats a better comparison to what was said and is additionally correct.