this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
1200 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59647 readers
3227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1200
The FCC is Expected to Propose the Return of Net Neutrality Protections Oct 19th (www.eff.org)
submitted 1 year ago by CrayonMaster@midwest.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Network neutrality is the idea that internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all data that travels over their networks fairly, without discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites or services

The FCC will meet on October 19th to vote on proposing Title II reclassification that would support accompanying net neutrality protections

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Did companies ever actually do anything after net neutrality went away? I still think it's a great thing to have but just genuinely curious if anything really happened cause I didn't notice much.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Did companies ever actually do anything after net neutrality went away? I still think it’s a great thing to have but just genuinely curious if anything really happened cause I didn’t notice much.

Well I doubt if companies would tell you "we are giving you a worse Internet experience so we can make more money", voluntarily.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/08/15/twitter-x-links-delayed/

Idk if this is actually a net neutrality issue because they're not an ISP but twitter absolutely added delays to links to websites that Musk doesn't like.

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't apply; X isn't an Internet Service Provider. They can screw over their users how they see fit.*

*Within bounds of law.

Edit: added clarification

[–] mob@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

It's plausible that some of the websites you like run faster because ISPs aren't throttling them, while throttling the competition.

[–] virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

My understanding is that they mostly haven't, with a couple exceptions like a few ISPs offering to priorities to pings for gaming (as FeelThePower mentioned), throttle certain protocols (e.g. Torrenting), or refuse to carry traffic for certain sites (e.g. Kiwi Farms). All of this would be prevented under net neutrality.

As far as I'm aware though, an extremely overwhelmingly portion of traffic (like you'd have to do a lot of digging to find an example otherwise) already adheres to net neutrality since it's pretty pointless for a company to spend resources and goodwill to mess with traffic.

I don't think too much will change. It is nice in the sense it will prevent an ISP from doing things against specific sites, although like mentioned above most of the protections are theoretical ATM.