this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
498 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Linking in trillium notes is PITA.

How do you work efficiently? Trillium is much more friction I felt when testing it out.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree that trilium could use more worth on linking efficiently. It's no various complements. I don't really have a method I just deal with it, sorry to disappoint.

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But what is your workflow then?

Just curious because I can see trillium notes as worthfully when really creating sophisticated notes, like finished documentation.

But for working with small/atomic/draft notes the workflow is just too much friction for me to use it as a tool despite documenting past stuff.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I generally finish thoughts out in sections in a note and if I feel I need a new note I can drop in a link or I can send a section into a new note. I find it actually has cut down on note bloat, my main pain point is quickly writing aliases. If I was a script writer I don't think it would be hard to improve the feel of it tbh.