this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1207 points (99.3% liked)

BrainWorms

1214 readers
444 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 234 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I still don’t understand how lobbying is legal. Like, it’s straight up bribery.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 99 points 1 year ago

Because the people who decide what is legal are the people who benefit from it.

[–] HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lobbying is supposed to be making your case to a politician, and hoping they vote/propose a bill/etc. With that interest in mind. You yourself are allowed to lobby your congress critters...technically.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're allowed, but without a fruit basket stuffed with money they're not going to listen.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're surprisingly not that expensive to buy though, 10k will get you pretty much whatever you want...

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$10k will get you access, but you won't convince a politician to do something that will cost them all of the other $10k checks they get from special interests.

Like if you wanted to buy a senator in order to get some earmarks for your development projects, you could probably get that buying a table at a fundraiser or two. But if you want them to pass legislation supporting unions or reducing the influence of money in politics, you'd basically have to bankroll their whole campaign because they wouldn't raise another dime.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder if I could use $10k to get a law passed that every company needs my safety manual in their business that I totally had professionally bound and didn't print at Kinko's.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The majority of Americans don’t have 10k unneeded liquid cash

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

No, but a bunch of Americans together have 10k, it just so happens that it's just the conservative ones who figured it out.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The lobbying is not the problem. The donations that sway opinions are the problem. If it was entirely unrelated to donations and the congress person was just hearing out all sides of an issue, that's a good thing.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Donations aren't to sway opinion they're to maintain a stock of dependent politicians who already agree with your position but who also need your funding to stay in office

[–] HoustonHenry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which will happen when hell freezes over

Edit- not saying you're not wrong though

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you ever called or wrote a letter to your congress person about an issue you cared about you were a lobbyist when you did that.

The problem is not lobbying, the problem is pay-for-play. Something like 80%-90% of candidates who spend the most money end up winning their election. Our politicians are owned by wealthy corporate interests who fund their elections. The solution is to get money — especially corporate money — out of politics.

There are a number of policy proposals that might limit the power of money in our politics, federally funded elections, regulations for how much air time each candidate gets, perhaps bring back the fairness doctrine, just to name a few.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

The "tea party"/freedom caucus are literally groups funded by the Koch brothers. The entire "movement" existed because they willed it to be with their money.

"Americans for prosperity" is Koch manipulating politics through who they fund to run.

[–] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but there's a difference between making one phone call and your job being to convince people to do things they would never do otherwise.

Or lobbyists being involved in drafting legislation.

[–] floppade@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In theory, it's partially meant to educate politicians who cannot be experts on everything in a world where information exponentially grows, but this system has clearly been intentionally used to abuse power.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Met a dude in 2015 who was a lobbyist for Boeing in DC. I heard he made 750k a year back then. He must be a really good educator!

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to work for a lobbyist on the hill, doing line standings. I would get paid to stand in line for hearings and committees and then the lawyers would come relieve you right before the hearing. Sometimes they wanted you to camp out the day before the hearing, and usually there were other line standers and it would be a circus, lots of fun.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Cool gig actually

[–] floppade@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

And I know lobbyists who are just regular people who looked up the process and did it. I’m not advocating for it, just giving context.

There are other examples of programs and policies being used in this way. Now, to me, the question is whether or not they are intended to easily abused by design. I don’t have the knowledge to say one way or another. However, as previously stated, it’s obviously being used as a bribery under another name.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think politician should be under 24 hour stream.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

id love to see them all going to the bathroom 😁

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Read about Citizens United please

[–] beetus@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If lobbying were illegal, that would mean all of the organizations that fight for justice lose their voices too.

Lobbying isn't bribery, it's persuasion

[–] Mudkipology@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Money ≠ speech. Now go back to bed, Mr. McConnell

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

No it just means they use their voices not money