this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
142 points (93.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26279 readers
1809 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bonus points if it's usually misused/misunderstood by the people who say it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

"Agree to disagree." No, dipshit, you're just wrong.

I do not agree to disagree, because we're not arguing about opinions. Your belief is simply, objectively incorrect. Or mine is, which is something that I would be willing to accept. If I were wrong, you'd be able to convince me that I'm wrong. We can keep going until one of us accepts that we didn't have an accurate understanding of reality.

It's always the dipshits that fall back on "Well, we will have to agree to disagree," usually right after they've been presented with enough evidence to change the mind of a rational person. Fuck that, I do not agree to disagree.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 46 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Agree to disagree is for things like "what ice cream flavor is best", not for things like "2+2=4".

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on that.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have found that the issue is often that people tend to not realize they're arguing that 2+2=6, they think they're arguing what ice cream flavor is the best

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

This is exactly the sort of argument that I was thinking of when I wrote the comment. We can agree to disagree on the best ice cream flavor, because everyone has different tastes. We cannot agree to disagree on whether the earth is flat, because it's not and we have overwhelming proof that it isn't.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I were wrong, you'd be able to convince me that I'm wrong. We can keep going until one of us accepts that we didn't have an accurate understanding of reality.

I had an ex like you.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You don't get tired of arguments? I see it as a 'fine, be stupid if you want' because I'm not spending more time on the point.

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You can walk away from an argument without agreeing to disagree.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agreeing to disagree is just more polite and often nicer for both, if such agreement is reached. You're basically saying that we can't really convince each other of our position so let's just leave it at that instead of trying endlessly.

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I just don’t like the phrasing because “agreeing to disagree” makes it seem like you are accepting that it’s good that they don’t agree with you. Saying literally anything else to convey what just said would make more sense.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't get that feeling at all, to me it sounds like you've just come to the conclusion that you shouldn't go on with arguing.

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well I do, so that’s why I don’t use that phrase and don’t like it when people use that phrase with me.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I use it as a politer version of "Could you stop talking now? Thanks."

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why do people keep acting like there’s nothing between 0 and 100? You could also say “I don’t think we’re going to convince each other in this conversation,” which is already politer, without having to ask someone to agree to something else that they don’t want to agree to.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Six of one, half a dozen of the other?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but if I mean that, I say that.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to sound mean. It's just a nicety.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

OK let's agree to disagree. 😉

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Let's agree to disagree

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, dipshit, you're just wrong.

Your belief is simply, objectively incorrect.

If I were wrong, you'd be able to convince me that I'm wrong. We can keep going until one of us accepts that we didn't have an accurate understanding of reality.

Boy if this doesn't describe most people arguing online lol.

which is something that I would be willing to accept.

I've found this is much harder than it seems. People either don't understand they're wrong (which might be the reason they're wrong to begin with) or unwilling to admit to being wrong even to themselves. So you'll have the first part of my quote lol

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Love your username