this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
595 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3941 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Army Gen. Mark Milley pushed back on claims from Republicans that the military is “woke” and as a result not prepared to take on modern threats, saying he’s “not even sure what that word truly means.”

“What I see is a military that’s exceptionally strong. It’s powerful; it’s ready. In fact, our readiness rates, the way we measure readiness, is better now than they’ve been in years,” Milley said in a CNN interview Sunday.

Republican politicians and candidates have blasted the Pentagon for so-called woke policies, pointing to efforts to recruit a diverse group of military service members and be inclusive to transgender soldiers.

Those claims have also headlined efforts to reduce military spending.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geosoco@kbin.social 216 points 1 year ago (12 children)

No one knows what the word woke means. Even people who use it can't define it. It's just a boogeyman word for things people don't like or want, and even they can't agree on it.

[–] TheBiscuitLout@lemmy.world 132 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m becoming more and more convinced that a “woke” person is anyone who calls right-wingers out on being overtly racist/sexist/fascist. Or maybe anyone who just isn’t obviously racist/sexist/fascist.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a catch all just like "communism" and "socialism" were/are. Big words that people don't know the actual definition of that can sound scary

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

God damn woke communists with their BLM Antifa caravans of socialist illegals!

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least "communism" and "socialism" have theoretical definition. But yes, they were so heavily pulled into propaganda warfare, that they basically are used as synonyms for "enemy", as opposite of "democracy" and "freedom", and so on.

Btw "free speech" is another term that is watered down more and more. Also again by the right wing fuckers who complain that whenever they are criticized it would be an attack on "free speech". Which is also bullshit. You can say (mostly) what you want without being suppressed. But you can't expect those that hear it to just swallow it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Ask every conservative screaming about their free speech being attacked where they stood on the Dixie Chicks during the Bush administration.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Woke does have a definition. The word has been in use for 80 some odd years. Regressives just latched onto it and destroyed all possible meaning in their determination to demonize anything they don't like. Woke to them just means Boogeyman.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's anyone they think will call them out. They don't even need to be called out first.

They declare something new is woke and then we call them racist/sexist/fascist

They're the ones picking targets, not us.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Always has been.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Last December, a Federal judge asked DeSantis’s general counsel to define “woke,” and he did, thusly:

He answered woke is "the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them.”

fascinating…

source

[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Really that's the closest we've come to an actual proper definition of the term "woke" by a conservative (and I'm like 90% confident that DeSantis' lawyers got that definition from the first few lines of the Wikipedia page on this term).

Yet, perhaps unsurprisingly, other conservatives give very different definitions, or none at all. VICE asked several conservatives at CPAC for a definition of the term and got a bunch of different answers (and vague non-answers). During an interview a conservative author who wrote an entire book about "wokeness" couldn't give a definition of the term. A few weeks ago Noah Samsen made a response to an anti-woke YouTuber by the name "Think Before You Sleep", who simply defined woke as "communism" (whatever he thinks that means).

For all intents and purposes, "woke" might as well just mean "anything vaguely progressive that I don't like".

[–] Jonna@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok a court filing, DeSantis lawyers defined "woke" as, "the belief that there are systemic inequities in US society and the need to work against them".

Which is not bad as a definition, really.

[–] Lutz69@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shit dawg then I'm woke af fr fr

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

And that's the point!

Sheeple woke up dawg

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Woke is when I don't like it.

[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

See also: socialism, leftism.

"Gat damned socialist liberals with their fascism" - your average proud neo-peasant

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

See also: the bizarre mind virus that's eating their brain alive. "No, you! Woke!"

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It still means what it always meant. Being aware of society's injustices to the poor, downtrodden, or minority population and wanting to do something about it. They can't fucking stand that.

Being against being "woke" truly reveals who they are. That they just want to sweep it all under a rug and forget about it.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that's insufficient anymore if we are considering the right's usage of the word. Marketing or selling products to those groups counts as woke to the right.

[–] yawn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The right doesn't use language genuinely, so personally I don't really care to consider their usages. The actual definition of words doesn't matter to conservatives, it's not how their brains work. That's why it's so easy for them to form a big tent party, they just need to say meaningless feel good phrases like "law and order", "1776", or "make America great again" to attract voters. That's also why when they get power, they dissolve into infighting and can't govern at all, because it turns out those phrases mean different things to all of them.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago

There's a sartre quote for that I keep around for just this circumstance

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

They don't use words for meaning.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's part of what I meant. Even the length that they admit to doesn't cover the full extent of their real intent.

[–] theterrasque@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Isn't that what desantis team defined it as when demanded by court?

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

When they are forced to under oath sure but the scope of their malice extends to not just the people they hate but anyone that will interact with them or even engage in commerce with them.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

No the problem is that woke does have a meaning, and most people know what that meaning is. The problem is that if republicans actually defined it out loud they'd have to admit what they actually take issue with and what they're actually fighting, and doing so would basically be admitting that they're the baddies. It'd be saying the quiet part out loud. By avoiding acknowledging the actual meaning of the word they get to pretend that wokeness is a nebulous Bad Thing that should be fought against.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

"Woke is now defined in this dictionary as “aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice),” and identified as U.S. slang. It originated in African American English and gained more widespread use beginning in 2014 as part of the Black Lives Matter movement."

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone knows what the word means, it's just impossible to define without sounding like a bigot. Because it means "not a bigot."

[–] nitefox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

for me, for example, it means “people who are all over their head with cancel culture”; it also means people [who use the word] are probably a bunch of far right crazies.

So overall I guess it’s a way to describe the two far ends of the same thing

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cancel culture isn't a thing, or at least it's not a new thing. People are facing consequences for their actions, as they always have. The difference now is that bigots are facing consequences. Used to be, you'd get cancelled for being gay, or for refusing to sleep with a superior, or for suspicion of being a communist. Powerful people would have to fuck with someone more powerful to have their lives ruined. Now, the powerful people fear the public scrutiny, and viral social media can bring down just about anyone (with notable exceptions proving the rule). So now they've given it a name, hoping to make people fear and hate the backlash enough to make people forget why someone has been cancelled.

It's bullshit.

[–] nitefox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I wasn’t talking about that, but the weird history shame/cancellation movement

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess you can have your own personal definition, but woke actually means being aware of systemic racial problems and working to correct them.

[–] nitefox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I guess, but it sounds like a very dumb word so I would use it to describe anything good or serious

To each their own I guess

[–] Naura@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is actually a real definition to it. For example one day I realized that black people exist in a world different than mine.

It woke me up to the realities of black existence

That’s why it’s “woke”.

When i had my kid and i read a bunch of stuff on parenting, i also came across those articles where black families needed to talk to their sons about police. It never occurred to me that people would need to so that.

[–] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Republicans are woke AF

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Woke is whack

Edit: LOL I meant the concept of "woke" being pushed by current GOP morons, not the concepts being described as woke

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

So smurfy of you