this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
836 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
3207 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember when NFTs sold for millions of dollars? 95% of the digital collectibles are now probably worthless.::NFTs had a huge bull run two years ago, with billions of dollars per month in trading volume, but now most have crashed to zero, a study found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 113 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Out of the top collections, the most common price for an NFT is now $5-$10.

Still overpriced!

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm honestly amazed they're worth anything at all.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

We have been attributing a huge value to a metal that's mostly remarkable for being yellow and shinny for millennia, one of the biggest investment bubbles in history was over a flower, and people thought that using a loophole to profit from the arbitrage of international reply coupons was going to last forever. Hell, people paid for fake property titles for land on the Moon and Mars. It's not that surprising that some people think that buying a random number in a distributed database is an investment.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Yellow, shiny, and untarnishable/non-poisonous. The latter are very nice properties to have for jewelry, as your skin will eat away most metals over time.

People like looking pretty, that has consistent value other than using it as a medium of exchange/ store of value.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the beanie babies, which just like NFTs were created to be scarce and be seen as an investment.

Turned out the same as well.

[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't get the "arbitrage of international reply coupons" reference. What's that one?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what Ponzi told people he was doing. And in the beginning he was, and it was working, but then he started paying investors with other investors money.

[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And in the beginning he was, and it was working

I might be wrong, but to my recollection, he never got it to work; in the beginning, he merely believed that he could eventually get it to work, and that the first fraudulent payouts to early investors were originally intended as a temporary way of buying time without losing investors.

Yeah, the really smart people bought whole stars!

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

True, but to be fair, them shiny metals for the longest time were reasonably rare and couldn't be made, and served well for a means of currency. NFTs are pretty ridiculous all things considered. People also "bought" stars too, so yeah, many will buy dumb shit.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

remarkable for being yellow and [shiny]

Yes, but also very rare, and effectively impossible to create or destroy.

[–] mrgoodc4t@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They’re still not

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd pay $10 to clown on some tech bro if I cared enough. $10 doesn't even buy you a sandwich these days

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Things only have a price when two people are willing to do the transaction.

Say 99% of NFT owners have given up and mentally written off their NFTs as a complete loss. If the remaining 1% are selling at a 90% loss and some sucker is still buying at that 90% discount, the "average price" will be whatever those two agree on.

This is a bit different from physical goods because those can't just be deleted out of existence. If someone had a warehouse of beanie babies they might choose to give them away (setting the price at zero) or maybe there's some tiny value of the cloth so they sell them for a few cents per kg.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

It's just a "Save picture as..." with extra steps, and money!

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

If you want to give me an NFT, I won’t accept it unless you sweeten the deal with an additional 20 €.