Linux Gaming

15784 readers

25 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq

Quintus@lemmy.ml

mudle@lemmy.ml

1199

5 years ago Valve released Proton forever changing Linux gaming (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 1 year ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Happy birthday, Proton!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I am getting a MacBook for work reason (my work required MacOS-only app, not my choice). I would prefer to only have 1 laptop if I could. So should I pay extra for higher model (more GPU cores) and use it for gaming? (I Mostly play racing game and single player RPG). Or would I better off by getting the base model MacBook pro, and a mediocre PC with the money left over (~$700)?

I've never owned nor used MacOS before.

Thanks.

[–] Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

macOS has made it difficult for both game developers and Wine developers to support the platform by letting their OpenGL support rot, removing 32-bit support, ignoring Vulkan and coming out with their own graphics API, Metal. Wine is in a worse state than on GNU/Linux. There aren't many native games available for macOS.

That being said, your best bet is likely CrossOver. They employ the principle Wine developers, worked with Valve on Proton, and have put a lot of effort into supporting macOS. They've got a free trial with complete functionality you can try out.

But if the games you're playing have native releases for macOS, that's not something you need to worry about. There are just so few games available on macOS that I assumed they don't. Now, I only have an Intel iMac which I never play games on so I couldn't tell you how the newer ARM laptops perform.

[–] sidhant@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is very out of date. The new game porting toolkit makes it trivial to play most windows games.

[–] foofly@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kind of. Its more aimed at developers to "port" the game rather than the end user. Saying that there will no doubt be a third party solution.

[–] Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 1 year ago

I was aware of the Game Porting Toolkit announcement. In fact, I first learned of it from CodeWeavers, who noticed Apple used their code to develop it.

We are ecstatic that Apple chose to use CrossOver’s source code as their emulation solution for the Game Porting Toolkit. We have decades of experience creating ports with Wine, and we are very pleased that Apple is recognizing that Wine is a fantastic solution for running Windows games on macOS. We did not work with Apple on this tool, but we would be delighted to work with any game developers who try out the Game Porting Toolkit and see the massive potential that Wine offers. Our PortJump™ team has perfected the art and science of creating ports of Windows applications using our Wine technology, and we welcome inquiries about how we can help get your game working on macOS.

I don't play games on macOS, but my understanding was the same as yours; that it was a testing tool for developers to test out how the game might work on macOS. That's how it was presented. I didn't think it was meant to be used by macOS users.

In any case, CrossOver is intended to be used by macOS users (and the GPT uses the same code, as enthusiastically explained above), and it has a good graphical interface. I think these factors make it obvious to recommend CrossOver as the canonical solution for playing Windows games on macOS.

load more comments (3 replies)