this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
195 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
276 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't need a license to learn from a story, but if learning requires you first to make an enduring copy of the story on your laptop then you could be violating copyright.

And neural nets generally require a local enduring copy of their training data, which means they too could be violating copyright.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t copyright only an issue when a copy is sold?

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

No. For example, most people who pirate software, movies, and music do not sell anything. But they are still violating copyright.