this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)
AskUSA
170 readers
334 users here now
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Please keep in mind:
- !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
- !asklemmy@lemmy.world
- !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
- !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
- !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's kind of simple, say you tarrif chinese electric cars because they are cheaper than USA made ones. Good right?
No, because now american EV makers doesn't need to compete as much, and you have to pay your Chinese EV plus tarrifs, or go with the USA made one, who was more expensive and/or worse from the beginning.
A thing here is obviously that in the EV example, the Chinese poured money into their EV market lowering prices, thus the tarrifs, right?
Well you can see it that without tarrifs now you can buy a cheap EV sponsored by China & their money.
Someone else might say that tarrifs helps american EV makers (debatable IMO), but either way it's always the consumer who pays the tarrifs.
Won't the American ev get more expensive anyway, because we source a lot of our battery materials from China?
That is the thing capitalism, they'll find something else to make it cheaper (child labour if they can push the laws) and sodium batteries seems particularly promising.