this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
226 points (99.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5394 readers
249 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7
226
In his final weeks, Biden aims to cut off funding for oil and gas projects abroad (grist.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago by PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat to c/climate
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t see how what you quoted negates the original comment.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 17 points 2 weeks ago

It's a multinational agreement, many of the signatories of which Trump will not be in charge of in any sense. And, even the US agency impacted is in theory "independent," which under Biden gave them some leeway to ignore his instructions to them. Although, Trump will surely mount an attack on that.

The point that I was making, which the article goes into more depth about, is that this is not just outside the executive branch, but a fully independent agency. Trump can attack it, sure, but he can't "overturn" the OECD, and getting this accomplished is not at all just a gesture.

More information is in the article.