this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
2115 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honest curiosity on your answer to this.

Google is the developer of Chromium and the Chrome browser which uses Chromium. Chromium is free and open source (though owned by Google).

I’m not sure how you break up Chrome and Google. That’s literally their product. Who are we giving this to? There are browsers that do not use Chromium (e.g., Firefox and Safari being the big ones).

[–] Jamie@jamie.moe 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Companies have gotten broken up before, like AT&T once did many years ago. In this case, a Google breakup would probably separate some of their services into different companies. At the very least Google (the "advertising" company) should be separate from Chrome (the "browser" company), because it creates a conflict of interest and creates monopolistic behavior.

In any case, trying to do something is better than doing nothing and hoping it turns out all right.

[–] PixelPlumber@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the poster is making a good point though- In this split, google the advertising company can freely contribute to the open source chromium. You need some model that leads the chromium maintainer to reject changes like this.

[–] Jamie@jamie.moe 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure there's some mechanism in antitrust to prevent the broken up companies from doing things like that. Otherwise, a "primary" company would just contract out the old other pieces and they're basically whole again.

[–] PixelPlumber@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s true, I just wonder if open source changes anything, legally. Unless one term of the breakup is “will not contribute to chromium”

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google isnt Google anymore. It's Alphabet. Alphabet includes Google domains, Android, Gmail, YouTube, chrome, Google search, search ads, play store, fuscia, Google maps, authenticator, chat, classroom, assistant, meet, nest, pixel, waze, Gboard, messages, google tv, Google photos and the rest

Each one of these have their own presidents, their own boards, their own teams. They are all directed by Alphabet.

[–] LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Spin it off on their own and survive like Firefox. Browsers make money putting links in the homepage and adding search engines.