this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
479 points (99.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2004 readers
2151 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 26 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Since 2010, they’ve raked in a combined $9 trillion in revenue, netting more than $371 billion in profits

When they phrase it that way the insurance companies actually look better than they're commonly marked for. If I'm putting the right number of 0s in a calculator that's a profit rate of 4.12% which is a heck of a lot less than places like the retailers where they can afford to have a half off sale.

What we could really use is breakout of the 'above bottom line' expenditures to see who takes what from each $ put in.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The metric you need is what percent of revenue was used to pay doctors and hostpitals vs how much was wasted on “buisiness expenses”

Profit is just the leftovers that they couldnt figure out how to spend before tax time

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Pretty well what I said with regards to the above bottom line. I know someone has put out some nice pie chart at some point to say what % of your premium dollar goes to what, will have to try and track one down.

Several years ago, a BadgerCare (the State of Wisconsin's Medicaid program) administrator told me once that the program has less than 3% administrative overhead. That means that out of every dollar spent on the program, $0.97 goes to pay for Wisconsin residents' medical care. He said that private insurance companies have something closer to 30% administrative overhead. I have no idea what it is now.

[–] kryptonidas@lemmings.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Profit is what remains after paying your executives large sums of money.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Profit is a useless measure in most respects. The money they spend on executive compensation and stock buybacks isn’t part of the profits. The money they funnel to their fake charities and non profits isn’t part of the profits. The money they give to politicians and high priced consultant friends is not part of the profits. Profit is really just what’s left over after quite of few people have already profited quite a bit.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

It also shows how convoluted and busy work the system is, how many utterly pointless jobs involved.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Retail stores don't kill people by raising the price of some shirt...