this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
548 points (96.3% liked)

World News

32075 readers
1069 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers have predicted the collapse of the AMOC could happen any time between 2025 and 2095 — far sooner than previous predictions, although not all scientists are convinced.

=====

What if...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1bluepixel@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

That movie felt way too real watching it.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but without the part where they tried

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We haven't gotten to that point yet

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Without some sort of violent revolution, we won't, or time runs out but it's not a movie and there's no ship to another planet.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Great. That's exactly what we need now - more violence

[–] Claidheamh 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there's ever a time when it's justified, it's when our very existence is at stake.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Climate change is not an existential threat to humanity

[–] Claidheamh 4 points 1 year ago

To humanity? Probably not. To billions of people? Definitely yes.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Revolutions take over where reason stops. The people in power have the means to do the right thing, but sometimes they look out for a few people and will destroy thousands. That's not a good option, as people get more desperate

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Climate change is not something that has a simple solution to it and governments just refuse to do so for whatever reason. That's a naive view that ignores all the complexity of this issue.

For example: stopping all carbon emissions is not going to stop climate change. Not only do you need to become carbon-neutral but you also need to get all the excessive carbon out of the atmosphere. How?

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Why the extreme? Cutting back and investing in things that are better should be a mandate, not an idea or option. And certainly we cannot allow an administration to roll things backwards just because someone ~~bribed them~~ donated to their campaign