Anarchism

3705 readers

13 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

Be respectful
Don't be a nazi
Argue about the point and not the person
This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq

New rule on hostility toward anarchism (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by Whom@lemmy.ml to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As a result of this community's existence on a site that is often hostile to its ideas, we'll be implementing a new rule:

4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your "epic dunks on the anarkiddies" is not. As a result of the instance's poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren't just looking to start a fight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah totally you're right, spaces should never be able to define a range in which discussion occurs and we should just all bend over to whoever wants to pop in and derail. Great suggestion.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

did i say bend over? use your words (and votes), not your modpower. this is one of the things that turned /r/anarchism to shit and you are perpetuating the same backwards discussion rules.

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Arguing basic premises all day long keeps discussion from actually going anywhere. Actual discussion flourishes among a group who can agree on the basics and actually want to talk about something more substantive than "is authority bad or is it actually good??????"

This community has so far been garbage because it's just anarchists posting links then people (largely from lemmygrad) starting fights on them over and over and over. That doesn't get anyone anywhere.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

whatever dude. you're literally doing the same shit lemmygrad does by banning people you disagree with. not to mention DELETING their comments/posts which just makes you look more fragile. I can argue that doesn't get anyone anywhere either. If you really think your ideology is better then maybe you shouldn't parrot the actions of the ones you claim are hindering discussion.

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Don't call me "dude," asshole.

But whatever, I'm ditching this instance anyway. This place feels more and more like reddit every day, where every single point must constantly be argued and there's very little left other than hostility. Most others seem to agree with your position, so go ahead and enjoy your reddit 2.0.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

Where are you going? Beehaw?

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Don’t call me “dude,” asshole.

wait, what? why not?

But whatever, I’m ditching this instance anyway. This place feels more and more like reddit every day, where every single point must constantly be argued and there’s very little left other than hostility. Most others seem to agree with your position, so go ahead and enjoy your reddit 2.0.

you're the one turning this into reddit 2.0 by adopting the same backwards mod actions. I'm not trying to be hostile, just arguing my point. AFAICT there has been no bad faith discussion anywhere in this /c/ and banning those who are participating in discussion is just sad, whether is falls in line with your ideology or not.