this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
42 points (88.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26980 readers
1354 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean, this question is not just about normal criminals.

Think like very bad crimes. Like serial killers, rapists, child rapists, terrorists, corrupt officials, terrible leaders, cruel dictators, generals that ignore laws of war, or like people has bad as Hitler. Which of these people do you think deserve a respectful burial, if any.

Is there a level of evilness that you think should not be allowed to have a proper buriel or have their corpses mutilated. Or should everyone deserve a respectful burial regardless of crimes.

I personally don't even know how to answer this question myself. Like the funeral isn't even for the dead. Its for the living. So to me, the question seems like, should the relatives of a bad person be allowed to see the corpse treated respectfully. I personally don't have an answer to this question.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fakir@lemm.ee 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If you dig up a skeleton, can you tell if that person was evil or charitable in his lifetime? We're all merely copies of each other and are equally capable of all the good and all the bad in the world depending on our individual circumstances and upbringings. Nothing is black and white and everything is gray. You'd be Putin too if you were in his shoes.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This says more about you than humanity as a whole.

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'll bite, what does it say about me?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you think people will do X, that means you think you would do X.

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I would do X too if I was in the same situation, with the same genes, and the same upbringing, and same circumstances, and same influences, and same traumas, and same biases.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Same genes? If your argument is that physics dictates reality, then sure whatever. But you wouldn't be you. You would be them.

My point is that, if you get to be YOU, but with all the same external stimuli, then people would choose to do different things.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

That is a remarkably bad hot take

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It is completely true; the only reason to punish bad behavior is to disincentivise it.

We are not born with inherent understanding of good, bad, and what ends justify the means. It's all absorbed from our surroundings.

For example, you can be an openly corrupt authoritarian leader or CEO of massive evil corporation, and see yourself as good as you learned to put your family first and that randoms are all self-interested, so you might be as well in the name of something you hold dearer.

There are many ways to corrupt a person's thinking in a way that is hard to unfuck as it gets fundamental. Harder, even, if the base idea is shared by many.

In that regard, getting cruel is, on the practical side, only really an attempt to reinstate other values, or, more commonly, implant fear in others, so they might consider the danger too high and chicken out.

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Excellent point!

Polish your mirror and look deep, you are the universe as am I, as was Gandhi and as is Putin, capable of all good and all evil, all shaped by life like a rock shaped by a river. The rock has no choice but to take that shape. The rock is special but no more so than any other rock, so don't assume you'd do any different if you were in their situation.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

lol, your counterpoint is hold to hold up Gandhi as the paragon of "Good?"

People are the aggregate of their choices. Behavior dictates the outward expression of inner motives. Sure, there are vast gulfs of grey within the theoretical discussion of black and white, but ultimately each person's legacy is simply a accumulation of the paths they have chosen, given the available options. To assume that everyone would make the same choices, when presented with the same opportunities, is simply not congruent to the patterns of human behavior that we see in reality, regardless of era or culture.

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Behavior dictates the outward expression of inner motives.

Correct, but you can't control your motives as much as you like. Think as much as you want about this.

To assume that everyone would make the same choices, when presented with the same opportunities, is simply not congruent to the patterns of human behavior that we see in reality, regardless of era or culture.

Show me what patterns you've seen, but from my personal experience and reflection, this is incorrect. We can't control the opportunities, and we can't control our motives, hence we can't control our behavior. You will do what you were gonna do.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Your core argument is essentially just a rationalization of your own behavior.

So my original analysis holds true: a remarkably bad hot take.

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 0 points 9 hours ago

You couldn't have changed your behavior if you tried