this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
492 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26866 readers
2913 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m_f@midwest.social 87 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

Slightly misleading without showing the color, only slightly though

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What's the reasoning behind? Or just a trend?

[–] m_f@midwest.social 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's just a long-running trend across many different companies towards simplification. Here's the Apple logo for example:

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

Gotta say, the original Newton logo would've looked sick if engraved on the back of a product. Too bad nobody has ever done it.

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Spotify and EBay made the right choices here, the new logos are way better.

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It is subjective, I like the old eBay logo more, but dislike the old Airbnb one.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Well, they certainly fin in better with all the others.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 51 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Better:

  • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
  • airbnb (from awful to meh)
  • Spotify (same)

Worse:

  • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
  • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
  • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
  • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
  • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
  • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)

The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

I liked the old aibnb one.

Microsoft went from "boring with a bit of attitude" to just plain boring

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 10 points 22 hours ago

DF gets points dedacted for missing the ü dots on both, looks absolutely stupid to a german speaker

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

All these minimalist labels save .0005¢ every time they’re printed, probably even more on promo booths, banners, and the like.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think it has more to do with being readable on small screens, like mobile phones. It still doesn't make sense to me to completely remove your logo and replace it with a sans serif name of your company like jaguar just did.

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

All the companies are gonna merge over the next decade or so, leaving a handful of megacorporations to lord over our cyberpunk dystopia. It's just easier if all their logos already look the same.

[–] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Aaaah then indeed that makes sense (and this is not ironic).

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I wasn’t being entirely serious, though there is an element of truth to it. It probably is a measurable cost savings over the scale of the business.

I still think these unremarkable corporate logos are boring AF. Just makes them visually soulless along with just being corporate soulless.

[–] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

I completly agree these logos are boring. The brand lost so much character and flare.

However I totally see "cost less" as one of the reason why these changes were pushed (especially for clothing brands).

[–] electric@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago

Except eBay, that was always trash.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 6 points 20 hours ago

I wonder how much correlation there is between logo blandification and being owned by giant corporations.