Technology

59559 readers

3258 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

851

Petition calls to ban Elon Musk's X in Europe (ban-x-in.eu)

submitted 4 days ago by FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853884

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853256

To whom it may concern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like this idea.

Twitter was supposed to be the "online town hall". And online public spaces are not publicly owned, they're run by private companies that can ban you at their own whims.

With each country having their own federated platforms, they can truly act as online public spaces where the usual laws apply as they would do offline.

You'd need to employ thousands of moderators though if everyone was online but honestly I think it's worth it.

But don't be handing out prison sentences for posting stupid shit. Online harassment and calls for violence can still be legally handled the same way they are offline, but jailing people for offensive jokes and stupid hot takes is just idiotic.

Best way is temporary bans increasing exponentially in length, then small percentage of income fines again increasing exponentially.

Also, and I'd argue we already need this, a court system for online crimes. This means the regular court system doesn't get more workload added on to it and specialist judges and lawyers can be appointed.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm okay with this as long as things like general political or religious speech is protected. When you're punised for speaking against the majority, congratulations you have left/center authoritarianism and it's no better than fascism in my opinion.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed. Perhaps the best implementation is a highly integrated mix of Mastodon and Lemmy where Mastodon is used for general discussion and news and Lemmy is used for organising communities around subjects like politics and religion.