Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2329 readers

425 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

WhoRoger@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

Awa@lemmy.world

For the first time, the elimination of a cancer is within our reach (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 17 hours ago by PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat to c/health@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

95% of cervical cancer is caused by HPV.

Source: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer

I thought the WHO said 99%, since numbers are different depending on which you ask, but this says 95%. Screening and treatment, which are also included in the article you’re claiming to have read, will very effectively prevent harm from the other 5%. Thus eliminating it as a public health problem. It’s a great thing, and here you are in the comments INSISTING that other people need to absorb your misunderstandings of the situation and I guess view it NOT as a good thing, or something.

Youre defending people who are saying the article says 94% of these can be avoided, when the article says 94% of cancers occur in those countries.

I don’t even know why I’m in this conversation. These are not mutually incompatible statements. 94% of the problem exists in the third world, and 95% of cervical cancer is caused by HPV. I don’t know why you are saying that the first statement somehow DISproves the second. They’re both true. Multiple statements can be true, even if they involve similar percentages.

That is, in fact, such a weird type of misunderstanding for you to be so confident about that I feel comfortable just ending the conversation here. Think, read the sources, learn. Or don’t. I don’t care.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

See youre conflating 2 things again, assuming everyone's mad probably.

All those stats are correct, so how could it possibly be that I would say such lies? I must be wrong, how weird.

You're forgetting there are other people in this thread, and someone did misquote it in their argument. Talk about retcon, which you spend 0 minutes explaining but made up half your earlier argument.

The numbers aren't even important. This is not a first time cancer breakthrough, this is a HPV awareness article with a sensationalized title. Nobody was arguing the numbers.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 14 hours ago

I’m not really upset with you, maybe I shouldn’t come out with such a negative demeanor and make you defensive. On the other hand, you started it, with your first dismissive comment about the whole article. I just wanted to post about public health in the third world and something good going on, and you seem like you’re really hell-bent on proving that there must be someone who’s really wrong here, other than you.

I am done. If it was all a misunderstanding then sure. Like I say, I just mostly don’t care at this point.