this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
143 points (78.0% liked)
Flippanarchy
160 readers
62 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I insinuated nothing, after the election Russian bots dissapeared, I just found it funny.
If A slows fascism B accelerates it so... Letting B win means accelerating fascism.
Not voting doesn't boycott anything. It doesn't stop the system from functioning, its not like Spain where if a coalition doesn't get an absolute majority (including white voters which are distinct from non voters) a second elections needs to be held, where the simple majority can win. This two step system is the wake up call white voters have for parties while still having the chance to actually vote in the second cycle. Plus, if the result would be fascism, it makes a loot of non votes vote on the second cycle. In any case, in america there's no white voting or anything, it's all simple majority wins so not voting isn't gonna boicott shit, only helps winners.
If they don't have faith in the system and they think that whatever they vote nothing will matter, then they don't get to complain when the worse option accelerates fascism since they partially caused that acceleration.
If both parties would act the same in this particular genocide, no voting again does nothing in regard so participating in genocide or not, citizens will regardless keep participating since it's their money that's going regardless of A or B.
None of those factors are the voters fault, no, but they are at fault of thinking that not voting they are saying something useful because they aren't.
The DNC fucked up big time by not appealing to those voters for sure, but let's not skip the blame on those voters when america gets even less rights for the LGTB+ collective and women way faster that it was going. I'm sure as hell not ever visiting america if any of that stuff changes, it scares me to even be a turist there.