this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
498 points (87.2% liked)

Fediverse

28724 readers
178 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

im gonna be real, this guy sounds like a loser. he talks about the progressive political lean and the porn as if they're BAD things

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Porn industry is certainly a bad thing though. It is quite hostile to women, and many have been harmed by it and wished they had a good exit.

Bit I definitely agree that progressive lean is a good thing. Fwiw I didn't read this article.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

The modern porn industry is much more independent than it used to be. Most creators control and own their content and choose where it gets uploaded initially. In the past, the porn business was absolutely abusive to their stars but I think it's much less the case these days. Filmmakers have to fight for actors because if they don't treat them well or pay them their worth, they'll just post their own content directly to their fans. I'm sure there are still huge negatives but I just don't think it's as bad as it once was and I certainly don't think the porn industry is something to be upset about these days.

[–] jmsy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know women in porn who say the opposite.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

Certainly some will say that, and even more would do if your environment is privileged (such as a safe neighborhood in the west or USA). You have to look at aggregate data, not anecdotes.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

When there in it, i'm sure there is going to be a bit of a bias.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Those are precisely why I like BlueSky. I don't know if this was normal for twitter or what, but I learned you can search for a hashtag of your kinks (exp. #bigboobs) and you can see porn from people that have posted pics or posts about it. You can also hide other tags from ever showing up in the results, which lets you finetune what you're looking for. I know the search works relatively the same as twitter with respect to hashtags, but was porn on twitter this whole time?

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

NGL I'm old enough now that I'd rather not see random tits in my feed.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve been on Bluesky since February. I have yet to see any nudity that I didn’t actively seek out. It’s not too difficult.

[–] JupiterRowland@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I'm on a (streams) instance on which someone else is following pr0n accounts. That instance is small enough (13 channels, including clones of external channels) to suggest them as contacts to me until I've removed them as suggestions.

Only boobs I saw without searching mastodon.social for non-pr0n hashtags.

[–] JupiterRowland@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Curated tits then?