this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
47 points (89.8% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

204 readers
134 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I was just scrolling through some of the referendums...what exactly is going on here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

nope.

that is part of one narrow definition of specifically chattel slavery.

here's another definition of slavery:

"compelled labor for the profit of another."

compelled labor(as practiced in US prisons) for the profit of another(like inmates providing service and revenue for private prisons).

here's a third:

"a situation or practice in which people are coerced to work under conditions that are exploitative"

by two of the three definitions, inmates forced or exploited to work are slaves.

one is probably enough.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slavery

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's the explicit definition barred under the 13th Amendment. So, it's the appropriate one to use.

Your other definition similarly doesn't work with your argument. It's not "for the profit of another" it's as punishment for a criminal act and even if the primary goal was profit, it's not "for another" it's being employed in the service of society.

The final definition also fall short. It's not exploitative, it's not coercion. It's forced and delivered by the established system of justice.

Here's the thing, you don't have to like labor as a criminal punishment. But, your distaste for the practice doesn't make it slavery.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

nope, you all kindsa wrong again:

compelled forced labor, especially for the profit of another, is the definition of slavery, and:

inmates are used to produce exports for the prison industry that prisons collect billions of dollars from in revenue.

that labor is often not punitive.

that is compelled labor for the profit of another.

it is exploitative because they are paid pennies on the dollar or not at all, while being charged to stay in prison and charged for the services they received.

most inmates leave jail at a net loss since US prisons, even though they're making money off the prisoners, are pay for stay.