this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
147 points (91.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

29698 readers
1381 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No, because a Utopia is a Utopia for everyone or it's not a Utopia.

[–] tomcatt360@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Utopia means "no place" so all utopias, by definition are imaginary.,

[–] NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes!

"The word utopia was coined in 1516 from Ancient Greek by the Englishman Sir Thomas More for his Latin text Utopia. It literally translates as "no place", "

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, when people say they'll be happy in utopia, they're unintentionally making a depressing dark joke?

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are essentially saying that they would be happy in a place that does not exist. Doesn’t exclude the possibility that happiness could still be found in a place that does.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago
[–] sho@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago

This the etymology yes.

"But it now usually describes an ideal society that is considered better than contemporary society."

So, as you can see we're not in ancient greece, are we? "Buzz lightyear smug squint"

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Utopias are inherently dystopian in they only work when everyone wants the same things and everyone is bound by strict rules. There is no such thing as a utopia.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting concept. Kind of like “is it really heaven if people you didn’t like while you were alive are also there?”

Utopia can never be utopia for everyone because some people will want hierarchy and superiority over others. So with this requirement, utopia cannot exist. Maybe that’s why it doesn’t :D

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Utopia" doesn't mean everyone gets what they want. People can want things to be worse while still living in a Utopia.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with your more sensible definition but it is a slippery concept.

It’s a bit ambiguous what it means to say:

unless it’s Utopia for everyone

Is it Utopia “for” someone if it isn’t their idea of Utopia? Seems like you are saying yes.

But if yes, then as long as current conditions meet anyone’s definition of utopia, then we’re all living in one.

Which brings us back to the OP.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But if yes, then as long as current conditions meet anyone’s definition of utopia, then we’re all living in one.

No, Utopia has a defined set of meanings. If current conditions meet someone's definition of Utopia, but doesn't meet the defined set of meanings, it doesn't mean current conditions are Utopia.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Where exactly is this defined meaning?

utopia (noun) an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.

According to Oxford Languages it is very much in the eye of the beholder and not objectively defined.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's go with the Cambridge definition:

a perfect society in which people work well with each other and are happy

The Oxford Languages definition is incomplete enough to not be a valid counter argument - "perfect" doesn't mean everyone 100% gets what they want. The only sensible interpretation is "perfect" from a societal perspective.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well we may just have to disagree. Even your definition requires that everyone be happy, and cooperating. I think that goes against your earlier contention that regardless of what people want, utopia has an objective definition.

It is what people want it to be, and people want different things.