this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1353 points (98.4% liked)

The Onion

4423 readers
2281 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You're talking to me as if I'm one of those non-voters.

Most Americans are not the terminally-online type - they didn't see your impassioned warnings about Trump. All they heard was that there was an election, and the choice was between Trump and Harris, and neither one really had anything material to offer them. To them, democrats screaming about how bad Trump is is just par for the course. They needed more than to not be Trump, and they didn't deliver.

Go ahead and scream into the void if you want. None of it will change the fact that Harris lost because she ran a bad campaign and turned her back on meaningful progress.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

One of her key points was human fucking rights (abortion if you need). That left people can't even show up for their own fucking rights... Well they won't show up for anything. Running a left platform is dead for decades.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Left policy is hugely popular - it isn't just the 'left people' you're referring to, it's also a majority of dis-affected voters who don't think they have anything to vote for

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's popular in blind surveys. Once they say it's a Dem idea, support craters. Chalk that up to whatever you want, it won't win Dems an election.

Disaffected center will go for center policy. While we see through Trump, this is what I think won Trump both elections.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No part of Harris's campaign can be thought of as 'left'. She ran on right-of-center foreign policy and center neo-liberal economic policy.

People are hurting from inflation and decades of wage stagnation and wealth disparity, and the democrats have no answer for that except means-tested bullshit.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

She didn't run a left platform exactly, BUT she relied on the left coming out to support their own fucking human rights and mfing democracy. She was very clear on that and it was a big part of her time. That they can't even do that, well that means they will never show up for literally anything. That means the Dems will never, never, never rely on the left coming out ever again. Kiss any left policy goodbye. Dems will run on "it's the economy, stupid" because yes we agree this was won on inflation and housing.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

Lmao, who do you think 'the left' is?

The 14million democrats who voted in 2020 but didn't in 2024?

Lol wow I had no idea 'the left' was that big

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Hey this looks familar! Yup it's you again with your non sequitur.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 29 minutes ago

Lmao

"It's the let's fault!"

"Who do you mean by 'the left'?"

"That's not relevant!!"

OK bud

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Well you're defending them.

And it's has nothing to do with my warnings. It has to do with the literal words he said out loud repeatedly.

Now all you're saying is American voters are ignorant and that's somehow Kamala Harris' fault. If they didn't know what Trump had to say, they didn't know what Harris had to say.

Again not a good excuse.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Here's the thing man: It doesn't matter one bit if you and I think they were terrible people for not voting Harris despite all the very valid reasons you have listed why they should have. (All of which I agree with.)

Bottom line: Dems didn't sell themselves to those voters in a way that worked. We can be outraged that it didn't work, but it didn't work.

So, we can wring our hands about how awful our fellow man is for not seeing the clear moral imperative that we do (exactly like the Genocide-Joe folks have been doing for months), or we can recognize that Dems need to start doing things differently.

Personally I'm of the opinion that unless they truly are just there to put up a token show of resistance against R while serving the same goals (and I'm not yet cynical enough to really believe that), they need to stop with this "let's move to the right and try for some R votes" crap. It's not getting them any R votes, and it's clearly pissing off a lot of D. Edit: And it's ratcheting the entire country rightward.

In my 50+ years they have never really moved to the left for more than a brief teaser. Let's see them seriously push for some Bernie or AOC crafted policies, etc. Some actual progressive fire. Stop treating the left like political suicide, and stop treating Republicans like they can be reasoned with.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm not defending them, I'm just explaining why that message didn't land the way you think it should have.

Most people think democrats are alarmist (and they often are), and even if they thought the threat was credible, they don't think it would affect them.

Call them dumb if you want, I don't care, democrats didn't do enough to turn them out either way.