this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
357 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5242 readers
606 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (25 children)

China is objectively better for the world right now.

lol

[–] leftytighty 5 points 1 week ago (24 children)

ok educate me. On the topic of climate in which ways has (or will) the United States be better? I'd appreciate the optimistic perspective.

Does the argument extend beyond China bad?

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When the people in China can go outside in public without wearing filtration masks I'll consider start taking their environmental approaches more seriously.

[–] leftytighty 1 points 1 week ago

What you're bringing up, even if true, would be explained equally well by population density.

China's per capita emissions are lower than the US and Canada https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/

They're also innovating and leading in solar technology and cheap EVs.

You're pointing at subjective and anecdotal "evidence" where are your hard stats?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)