this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
79 points (85.6% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

315 readers
4 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
  1. Mod of !anarchism@slrpnk.net posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @mambabasa@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] punkisundead 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think this person has learned how to manipulate the Slrpnk admins to their liking for their own political ends.

I dont know why you would need such conspiracy theories when there is a much simpler way to explain it, which was confirmed by most folks(mods and admins alike): We are fine with the moderation actions taken, we dont need to be manipulated for this.

Its quite something to make up a conspiracy after writing this just a few sentences earlier:

I’m not a troll. I don’t make bad-faith arguments, [..] or inflame things to no purpose.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't seen evidence of a strong majority being fine with the decision.

Among slrpnk commenters on this post I believe the split was 3-3, or possibly 3-2-1.

Taking into account the comments from dbzer0 folks, it goes to 5-5 or 5-4-1.

Self-proclaimed anarchists from other instances represent, by my accounting, 1 more "for" and 4 more "against."

The other comments from users who may or may not identify as anarchists appear to slant towards against by about the same margin.

It could be that one or both of us carries a bias in how we perceive support that aligns with what we already believe. I tried to be cognizant of that when I scrolled through to count, but I'm fallible. If I've misrepresented, it wasn't on purpose. That said, I think at best there's a somewhat even split. I don't think you can claim that as "most folks" being fine with the actions taken.

Additionally, the way the mod conducted themselves in these comments doesn't inspire much confidence that they moderated in good faith

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mambabasa's posting history at the time I looked at it started with:

  • Kamala Harris = genocide
  • Kamala Harris = genocide
  • Democrats = party of genocide
  • Kamala Harris = genocide
  • Democrats = genocide
  • Greta Thunberg quote
  • "Elect the Democrats" satire
  • "Vote Democrat" satire
  • "Vote Democrat" satire
  • "Vote Democrat" satire
  • "Don't think, just vote" satire
  • "Vote Democrat" satire
  • "Don't think, just vote" satire

I don't think it's inflammatory or a conspiracy theory to say that there's a visible pattern there which points to a very un-anti-electoral goal for their participation. If I was doing half the spamminess of participation that their history evinces, or done half as much inflammatory participation as they've done in these comments, I'd leave the platform on my own, feeling bad that I'd done that much to bring badness to the platform.

We are fine with the moderation actions taken

Clearly. Like I said, have fun with it.

[–] Five 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

SLRPNK is an intentionally both an international instance, as well as an ideologically diverse instance. We give a lot of autonomy to moderators. Despite being administered by anarchists and having a significant membership that identifies as anarchist, we expect our anti-fascist moderators to follow the politics of their conscience rather than toe a particular anarchist line. Solarpunk is an internationalist movement, and should not be dominated by any one country or culture.

These two goals sometimes create tension. A significant portion of our international audience is from the United States, and some SLRPNK moderators have filled their community feeds with Democratic Party propaganda. I guarantee @mambabasa does not want Trump to win, and criticizing the hypocrisy of liberal politicians and the losing proposition of elevating electoral politics above direct action is not an endorsement of fascism.

Mambabasa’s posting history at the time I looked at it started with:

His meme posts exist in the context of a local feed full of United States election centered news in what is supposed to be a haven for internationalists and anarchists. They're a reminder that anarchists are not edgy Democrats, and if that idea is offensive, you can unsubscribe and block !anarchism and !notvoting@slrpnk.net. Other people existing who don't share your politics and have their own spaces should not be so threatening to someone with confidence in their own ideology.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

some SLRPNK moderators have filled their community feeds with Democratic Party propaganda

Do you have an example of this? Which community?

[–] Five 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ask this guy, I think he can guess at least one of them. Remember to tell him anarchist admins are the real authoritarians because we support our community moderators, and that we're bad for letting people into our space to use it for political propaganda, because they are making a pretty thin and implausible claim to being on our team.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wasn't asking that as a sarcastic question. It was serious.

I don't think there are communities on Slrpnk that are brimming with Democratic propaganda. There's some kind of weird backwards-ism going on here, where Mambabasa constantly spamming stuff about Harris and the Democrats counts as some kind of innocent anarchism, and I'm dogpiling partisan propaganda on him when I say that actually it sounds pretty clear to me that Greta Thunberg is saying Trump and specifically Trump is a terrible threat. I think you're exaggerating events into this caricature, and then telling me straight-faced that the caricature is what's going on. But, maybe not. Maybe I'm wrong. So, I asked about the Democratic propaganda on Slrpnk that you're saying is happening.

I think the bulk of Lemmy, anarchist and not, sees it the same way I do here. You can look up and down in these comments if you want. You and the other Slrpnk admins are not required to see it the same, of course, or to give me a serious response. You can say whatever you like. But it was a serious question.

[–] Five 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't think you were asking sarcastically. But I don't think you're serious.

You're attacking SLRPNK for being covert Republican operatives when you're simultaneously commenting in another YPTB thread that's calling us out for being covert Democrats. I should not have to do this much hand-holding with someone who genuinely wants information. The answers are right under your nose, but it benefits your grandstanding victim complex not to see them.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re attacking SLRPNK for being covert Republican operatives

I didn't say that. I said Mambabasa is. I think the rest of the Slrpnk team is supporting him in this because he identifies himself as an anarchist and fits in with your team.

He posted a meme about Jill Stein, which is a weird thing for an anti-electoralist to do, and then denied ever having done that and claimed not to know who "this Jill person" was, when I asked him about it. He's been assaulting various people in the comments for all kinds of various imaginary things.

Most of the anarchists and others in this comment section who looked at his conduct, and his posting pattern, haven't been at all in favor of what he's doing. I don't know if anyone but me thinks he is deliberately posting political propaganda. I definitely think that. I think the rest of you are being overly kind to someone who is hijacking the community you're providing so they can propagandize it, giving a bad name to anarchism by their overall conduct, and not really promoting anarchism for the last few weeks, so much as let's-elect-Trump ism. Some other clues such as posting Greta Thunberg's quote and insisting that it means we can vote for third parties since it doesn't matter who wins the election are present as well.

You can think what you like. But yes, that is what I am attacking him for.

you’re simultaneously commenting in another YPTB thread that’s calling us out for being covert Democrats

You missed the "/s"?

I was clearly making fun of the OP of that post for complaining about Slrpnk being covert Democrats, when Slrpnk is about the furthest thing possible from that, and the issue was clearly OP. It seems like what I said was widely understood to mean that within the comments.

[–] Five 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You missed the “/s”?

No. I understand your sarcasm. I'm confused by your sincerity.

Why do you think the OP mistook SLRPNK for Democrats?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have no idea. If I had to guess, I would say that index’s history pegs them as one of the accounts that posts almost exclusively “why the Democrats and specifically the Democrats are bad” content, along with being aggressively toxic to anyone who has anything to say about it, and they were banned for the toxicity and then proceeded to whine about it using whatever random bad-faith nonsense came to mind. In this case, what came to mind was the well-worn trope that the mods were brainwashed by liberal propaganda and were censoring anything truthful to try to push their program of getting Kamala Harris elected.

I don’t know any of that for sure of course, and I didn’t care enough to do more than a brief investigation. I just thought it was funny that they were applying reflexive accusations of liberal whitewashing against a target that was even sillier than most of the targets that it gets applied against.

[–] Five -1 points 2 weeks ago

I didn’t care enough to do more than a brief investigation

Apathy and lack of curiosity towards people who think differently from you is a virtue, don't let anyone else tell you otherwise. Never change, Phil.