Asklemmy

43685 readers

2445 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

258

Why are so many Pro-Palestine (I am pro-Palestine and anti-genocide) Americans refusing to vote for Harris due to her stance on Israel? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

421 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd rather vote for the party that's 85% nazi than 100%. And in a world where it's entirely unrealistic that anyone else can win between past-the-post voting and voter disenfranchisement, that's the best we're getting.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This was a meme like 6 years ago, that we'd get to the point that US democrats would accept a candidate that's 99% pro-genocide compared to the 100% republican one. It's worked, and now democrats are falling over themselves to defend this genocide and their party's staunch material support for it.

Keep voting tho, its working great so far. The USA keeps improving by doing the same thing over and over again. /s

[–] macabrett@lemmy.ml 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

holy shit they're actually doing the 99% hitler meme now, this country is cooked

[–] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

oh to be clear. I know the democrats are doing terrible things, I just think it's easier and more practical to get them to stop than it is to keep them out of office.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah good luck with that buddy that's definitely been effective in the past and totally isn't more of what got us here in the first place and isn't actively undermined by the current protests going on and the presidency being at stake for them and their policies still not budging or their voters' demands even being acknowledged.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dude. Sentences are useful.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

eh. Not my style.