this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
537 points (79.6% liked)

Science Memes

10783 readers
2909 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Assuming this meme is some form of Marxist propaganda, it would be a self-defeating meme, since Marxism is rooted in dialectical materialism which is itself a scientific process. At least according to Marx.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

ITT it's still the 1920s I guess.

Political theory has moved on since those days, you know.

Granted, there are people who quote Marx like he's a religious figure but those people are wrong and stupid.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Woah woah woah, I'm not a Marxist, but you're going to have to back up your claims on how "political theory has moved on" and why that ties into Marxism not being based on dialectical materialism.

[–] fern@lemmy.autism.place -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please list all the recommended political theory you've read from the 1920s to now that disproves whatever you're claiming is purely 1920s political theory.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Heh, you're a leftist? Name every leftism.

Look up critical theory if you want to.

[–] fern@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Buddy this is critical theory.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I think I somehow replied to the wrong comment, it was meant to be a reply to the guy who randomly started talking about Marxism

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to deflate your assumption, but "Science is pure objectivity and truth".

The assumption you introduced just added another layer on by bringing Marxism into it. And here's the thing with that fallacy; you may be very right! But, it's got nothing to do with the original statement anymore. It's just going down tangents of a tangent that should be explored under their own initiative, not the blanket of "science".

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Well i guess you're right. I just wanted to point out an observation. Guess i just got ignoratio elenchied

Unfortunately that's not how communism works in practice