this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
702 points (99.9% liked)

HistoryPorn

4904 readers
290 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When used completely and properly. Which rarely, if ever, happens because it requires end-users to know how to use keys and keep them offline somehow.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This system hasn't lasted ~90 years because they just throw someone in a chair and let them figure it out on the job.

Any reliable system, electro-mechanical or digital, needs thorough user training and checks.

The worry with this one is it's a single authoritative record with no easy way to backup or replicate it. They say there are non-authoritative (at least legally) digital versions of most(?) of the records. I hope/assume they're actually more consistent with that than the video makes it seem because those are the only feasible off-site backups they really have. If not one fire is all it would take to wipe out an entire countries SSA program.

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a government office. A government should be able to build the technical knowledge required to keep a private signing key secure.

I do agree that individual-to-individual cryptography is more difficult, but how often do you need to check the authenticity of a document from a friend or acquaintance, digital or otherwise?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, a bank. A financial transaction. Health records. Not just email to your friends.

Government has the technical knowledge - heck many people here have that - but implementing a standard is a different problem, it’s a political problem. A pit full of vipers, in a sense. We’re unlikely to see standardized crypto signing anytime soon. At least IMO.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Has the potential. It’s another case of having a technical solution, but the implementation of it is the real problem, and the real hurdle.