this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5289 readers
519 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
49
‘I love the smell of success more than petrol’: Australian investors break with tradition in world-leading climate campaign (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 month ago by silence7 to c/climate
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Investors say climate change poses biggest risk to their assets, and urge Albanese government to see the economic dangers of a slow path to net zero

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silence7 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's definitely possible to get a lot this way. It probably can't do enough, fast enough, on its own though — it will take government forcing the transiation to happen. Otherwise, we'll get the energy equivalent of whale blubber being turned into margarine in order to keep the whaling industry profitable.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No you’re not getting what I’m saying.

Getting people with shitloads of money to recognize that portfolios are gonna fuckin TANK when the climate implodes is what’s going to move the needle at the end of the day. They don’t care about anything except ROI. If that becomes negative for anything related to stuff that’s environmentally harmful, that’s what will change the equation for them.

[–] silence7 5 points 1 month ago

That might just result in a boom in billionaire bunkers, rather than any kind of systematic attempt at solving the underlying problem.