this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
1540 points (95.2% liked)

Political Memes

5612 readers
1970 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I listed the sources. If you can't manage the independent volition to do a simple Google search, than I'm afraid you're simply going to have to remain ignorant.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where? I do not see a single source. I see you referencing that such sources exist somewhere, but I fail to see any titles, authors, or web links to actually provide a specific source.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The author and agencies are listed. It's not my responsibility to do the labor of educating you further than I already have. If you need to be hand fed links, then you're going to remain exactly as you are. I've already put enough time into the post. This is close enough to sealioning in my estimation for me to block you. Good luck.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Actual analyses done on this topic by Pew, Breugel, and National Affairs suggest this effect is largely not true. When considering the entire electorate, a significant number of non-voters lean Republican or are politically unaffiliated and would not support the democratic party.

Further research indicates that, despite popular belief, higher voter turnout does not consistently benefit either party across the board. Over the past 70 years, there has been no strong correlation between increases in turnout and the Democratic vote share in presidential or midterm elections.

I am not sure how to find this. I actually already looked at a Pew article earliee today and didn't happen to see it there.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/voter-turnout-2018-2022/

I'll link it again and look through it again to see if it's there.

Further, your second point is lacking any source including an author.

Last, whatever source you're quoting specifically important because I'm highly curious what the verbiage actually is. There is a world of difference between someone who "leans" Republican versus someone who will never vote Democrat.

Eta, from above Pew source:

Adults who voted in at least one election during the period divide evenly between Democrats and independents who lean toward the Democratic Party or Republicans and Republican-leaning independents in their current party affiliation (48% each). The subset who voted in all three elections are similarly divided (49% Democrats, 50% Republicans). Citizens who did not vote in any of the three tilt Republican by 46% to 41%.

Reflecting these patterns, Republicans won a majority of votes among those who said they voted in person on Election Day, 60% to 38%. Democrats won – by an identical margin – voters who said they voted by mail or absentee ballot. Those who said they voted in person before Election Day were divided: 53% supported Republican candidates, while 46% voted for Democratic candidates.

Perhaps if Dems were able to pass easier mail in voting or better legislation generally, people would be more likely to vote for them