this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
240 points (97.6% liked)

News

23287 readers
4709 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"The U.S. is more problematic because it is harder hit by a range of issues that kill people even before they hit old age, including drug overdoses, shootings, obesity and inequities that make it hard for some people to get sufficient medical care."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

As the population in Western countries age without younger people to replace it, and take care of the elderly, I'm going to guess the opposite will happen.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

They'll just import people in from around the world to replace lagging birthrate.

Overall birthrate is expected to peak around 2080 so there's still plenty of time to shuffle people around!

In Canada we used to have a serious immigration policy that was part of the Canadian identity, and now we're literally flooding the country with people almost exclusively from 1-2 countries with no qualifications required.

The workforce collectively lost significant bargaining leverage as millions of desperate people continue to saturate job markets and suppress wages.

Plenty of jobsites have no oversight regarding certification, so even educated people lose out because it's cheaper to train a desperate person on the job and pay them next to nothing/under the table instead of hiring an educated workforce with labor rights and who expect a wage that reflects their abilities.

For what it's worth, I know plenty of educated people who are awful at their jobs too. This isn't anti-immigration, it's acknowledgement that immigration is being used to suppress everyone's wages to the exclusive benefit of employers.

So even if all the Western countries get border walls with 100% coverage and catch rates, western governments everywhere will happily throw open the gates for cheap labour regardless of public opinion

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This doesn't sound real to me.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They'll just import people in from around the world to replace lagging birthrate.

I didn't realize I was going back in time. What year is it? I'd like to make a few investments.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Anti-immigration is always protectionism, and hinges on the fact that people tend to like people they know more than people they don’t.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In Canada we used to have a serious immigration policy that was part of the Canadian identity

This sentence is insane, care to explain how immigration policy has ever been a part of Canadian identity? As far as I know, "Canadian identity" consists and has consisted mostly of hockey, crappy coffee, and a false sense of superiority over the USA.

I love how you seem to be focusing on immigration as the issue rather than capitalists exploiting desperate people, even though you seem aware of the abuse the wealthy inflict on the rest of us. Yes, companies abusing immigrants in desperate situations is common and a huge issue. The solution is not curbing immigration, it's regulating corporations.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Man, I love it when people stop reading after finding one of their trigger phrases.

Try reading the entire comment next time.

Don't know why I'm wasting my time writing more stuff you won't read, so I'll just call you a dummy now before you fully stop reading this comment too.

  1. growing up I always felt Canada was a peacekeeping nation that helped people out and gave people struggling from war/oppression a safe place to live and become a part of the Canadian tapestry. America brought war and bombs while Canada brought hockey, donuts, a warm coat, and bad coffee. Polite, warm, and welcoming were definitely part of the Canadian identity and a source of our superiority to America.

I myself am a first generation Canadian, so yeah - kind of a fan of immigration, even if my homeland is arguably better than Canada.

  1. literally every other part of my original comment directly stated immigration was being used to suppress wages and it exclusively benefits employers to the downfall of everyone. And that it's not the fault of immigrants, but broken politics favoring wealthy interests.
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well first off, it seems my first comment came off as more aggressive than I intended, based on your name-calling, so sorry about that, I didn't mean to upset you in anyway.

I did read your entire comment (both of them, actually!)

I'm just frustrated by your take, because immigration is ultimately irrelevant to the shitty job market, the housing crisis, or whatever else the right likes to blame on immigrants these days. Immigrants are a scapegoat to avoid general frustration being directed towards the ruling class responsable for the conditions we live in.

If your issue is with companies exploiting workers, why does your comment do nothing but talk about immigration policy?

growing up I always felt Canada was a peacekeeping nation that helped people out and gave people struggling from war/oppression a safe place to live and become a part of the Canadian tapestry.

That's honestly quite an idealized portrait of Canada.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Immigration has nothing to do with housing or job markets?

Are you suggesting that the fundamental principles of supply and demand don't count because immigration =/= the ruling class?

You have 0 reading comprehension my friend, I'm also fairly left leaning and anti establishment which is plain as day in my comments.

Definitely must be frustrating to try and (wrongly) attack someone objectively left leaning and anti establishment for being right wing.

Also, what was your portrait of Canada growing up? Exclusively hockey, Donuts, bad coffee, and free healthcare? That's all the national pride/identity you've ever had?

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying supply & demand doesn't count, I'm questioning why you're so focused on the demand incurred by immigration and not landlords are the wealthy artificially limiting supply for their bottom line. Immigrants are not to blame for our woes, it's always the ruling class.

Definitely must be frustrating to try and (wrongly) attack someone objectively left leaning and anti establishment for being right wing

I'm not attacking you, I don't know you, I'm just trying to respond to what you said in your comment. I'm not sure where you read a personal attack in my comments (if I recall, you're the one who called me a "dummy") but sincerely sorry if anything I said bothered you.

I don't care (in the context of this conversation, anyway) whether you're a right-winger trying to stir anger against immigrants or a left-winger who's been submerged in so much right-wing rhetoric from the mainstream media that it's infecting your worldview (which, hey, it happens to the best of us).

You're parroting right-wing framing that immigrants are at the root of the issue when in reality they're victims suffering just as much (and often more!) than the rest of us. That's what I'm addressing. You'll just have to trust me when I say that I haven't formed a negative opinion of you as a person based off of one interaction on Lemmy.

Also, what was your portrait of Canada growing up? Exclusively hockey, Donuts, bad coffee, and free healthcare? That's all the national pride/identity you've ever had?

I've never been really into nationalism. Even then, I'm francophone so my relationship to Canadian identity is complicated to say the least, and I'd much earlier identify as Acadian than Canadian. At least as an Acadian I can be proud that we've maintained our culture throughout centuries of attempts to assimilate us. Most "proud Canadians" I know are just kinda xenophobic. Either that or they're immigrants who worked hard for their citizenship, in which case I feel that's more pride in themselves than pride in the country.