this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
1159 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59366 readers
3594 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not about intelligence it's about what keeps you up at night. Most people aren't bothered by cookies and ads, somehow.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

this is something i cannot understand. my brain would fking die from the seizures the modern, ad infested web induces.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the creepiness. Advertisers can deduce many habits based on the information you give them. Some techniques can tell when people are pregnant before they do based on their pathing inside the store, for instance.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

And yet, all they continue to sell me is a dryer when I just bought one a month ago.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It used to be worse. Pop up ads are mostly a thing of the past. The web used to be an advertisement shit hole and there were no ad blockers back then.

Regardless, you're right. I don't understand why or how people could be ignorant of the existence of adblock in 2024 unless they're boomers.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

Since ads began, there have been ad-blockers. You just didn't know about them.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Most people are stupid, myopic imbeciles that arent bothered by anything until it personally affects them.

Then they'll howl like wolves at the moon about the great injustice of it all, and how could anyone allow this to happen.