this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
308 points (98.1% liked)

Games

32368 readers
1235 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

chuckle

Author apparently thinks hardware emulation is the only kind of emulation.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wine is not an Emulator is not an emulator.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gnu's Not Unix Image Manipulation Program

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

personal homepage hypertext preprocessor hypertext preprocessor

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

API wrappers are not emulators.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Anything that emulates something else is an emulator. That something else could be hardware, or runtime behavior, or services, or a combination thereof. (It could even be a turtle, although we're talking about computers in this case.)

Wine is an interesting example despite that silly backronym that was abandoned years ago, or perhaps because of it. It not only translates system and API calls, but also provides Windows work-alike services and copies Windows runtime behavior, including undocumented behavior. If it were just an API wrapper or "translation layer", a lot of its functionality wouldn't work.

The shape of a business envelope might not be an equilateral rectangle, but it is still a rectangle.

But go ahead and believe what you want. I'm not looking for an argument.