this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
554 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
3646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This breaks the current SB implementation, but if the ad duration is known and consistent across the userbase then it will fix itself as users tag videos with the "new" timestamps.

That only works if the ads served are all the same or at least same time length. Which is very unlikely.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the article didn't say anything about consistent durations and spacing. It might be the case, but I have no idea how to find that out.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Consistent duration can be assumed, because that's how advertising works. The 15-second spot is still the standard.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean it might be, or they could decide to deliver 30 second ads to people they think are more likely to watch and 15s to ones they don't. I don't know enough about this implementation, for all I know they could have offset it by a few seconds because of Sponsorblock. Seems like they'd do anything to try to push more ads so who really knows at this point?