this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
83 points (96.6% liked)

micromobility - Ebikes, scooters, longboards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

2226 readers
225 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nope, definitely not. That is wasted space. The back is for holding a backpack with a hydration reservoir. Anyway, I'm trying to gain strength and lose weight, not reduce my times by .02%.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Believe it or not, hydration packs have been shown to reduce aerodynamic drag for cyclists. There was a brief moment in pro cycling where riders wore them during time trials to shave a few tenths off their time. Strangely, the benefit of wearing one backward (on your chest) is a little bit better than wearing it on your back.

Needless to say, the UCI quickly banned hydration packs altogether.

[–] Seditious_Delicious@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

'cause the UCI are dickheads and want to live in 19..f@#k!ng..10. Let fixate on sock height, frame weight, aero tuck and shifter angles, but ignore road furniture, dickhead crowds assaulting riders and fine riders when the organisers cant organise (looking at you Vuelta)

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You're preaching to the choir, my friend.

[–] we_avoid_temptation@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Strangely, the benefit of wearing one backward (on your chest) is a little bit better than wearing it on your back.

That's fascinating and makes me wonder if wearing both at once was tested. I can't imagine it'd be comfortable though.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They definitely did try both but I don’t know if anyone was ever cheeky enough to wear that setup in an actual race.

Currently they’re putting race radios in the front, centered side to side, during TTs. Rumor has it that the UCI has already had to tell a couple of teams to stop using extra tape and stuff to embiggen the radio lump.