this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
166 points (96.6% liked)

World News

32311 readers
703 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20492321

Jonah Valdez
September 19 2024, 8:44 a.m.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 63 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if the military targets killed by these devices are not considered war crimes, there were several civilians killed and those deaths should be considered war crimes.

The problem with using a weapon like this is that you can't possibly know who is nearby at the detonation time. To me this seems similar to butterfly mines which have been internationally banned for 2 major reasons:

  • they can end up outside the military operation area - they're light enough that they can be blown off-course while falling, and will float downstream if they land in water
  • children pick them up because they look like plastic toys

It seems like the same logic should apply - this weapon is not discriminating enough and is therefore not a legitimate military option.

[–] TheYang@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wonder what the effective radius of these things was (and what it wad expected to be)
low amount of explosives + low density shrapnel may have made this basically a touch-distance weapon.