this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
793 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Billie Eilish is the latest high-profile entertainer to back Vice President Harris’s White House bid, urging her fans to “vote like your life depends on it.”

“We are voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz because they are fighting to protect our reproductive freedom, our planet and our democracy,” Eilish said in a video posted on social media on Tuesday.

“We can’t let extremists control our lives, our freedoms and our future,” Eilish’s brother and longtime collaborator, Finneas O’Connell, said in the message shared with the “Lunch” singer’s more than 7 million followers on X.

“The choice is clear,” the post said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I see that Dolly said some real nice things about Taylor Swift. Still don't think Dolly will endorse anybody, though.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

God, imagine if Dolly did endorse her.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Dolly is in deep Tennessee, where the majority who visits her theme park, listens to her music, and supports her, are Christian Republicans.

She's smarter than the Dixie Chicks.

She won't endorse Harris but will likely vote for her.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I lived there.

I really wonder whether it would open more peoples' eyes, or get her threats of violence.

I could see a lot of both coming :(

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She has so much more sway than The Chicks had at the time, by such a huge amount.

The Chicks were already controversial, and had always been so.

But Dolly is the fucking queen of country, people revere her.

How many Dixie Chicks lookalike competitions were you seeing right before their career nosedived?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont think we need more celebrity endorsements. Help people get lawn signs

[–] NoMadMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Personally waiting for Bart Simpson to endorse somebody...

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People may revere Dolly. But given the propensity for violence by the Alt-right, she isn't going to risk damage to her parks or threats to her employees.

The only upside Dolly has is standing on the right side of history but that's not something she'll see in her lifetime.

Edit: Though if Dolly were to endorse Harris, and she were to (heaven forbid) experience alt-right violence, I could see that as the catalyst for base Republicans moving towards the center.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Then Boss Ross and Fred Rogers rise from the grave briefly just to say that they both think Harris and Walz are really nice people and would do a good job.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Rs already came out and attacked Dolly a few months back. She probably has the mentality of just staying out of it.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't they attack her for giving free books to poor kids?

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I honestly can't remember, and some searching couldn't come up with anything. I'm like 80% sure it wasn't about her books though.