this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
91 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5191 readers
55 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They should split it in two drivers, one legacy and one all other.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least two. Or make it with modules and only load the necessary one.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right; any solution they come up with presumably needs to be more scalable than "new drivers" and "old drivers". Eventually there will be too large a set of "old drivers" and we'll end up in the same situation with a small "new drivers" driver and a large "old drivers" blob.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A different driver set for each chip architecture maybe?

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe; it does sound like reducing the size of the driver is potentially possible as well https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMDGPU-Headers-Repo-Idea